AI033还请各位指教judy修改标题见谅 - ChaseDream

33. “People are likely to accept as a leader only someone who has demonstrated an ability to perform the same tasks that he or she expects others to perform.”

花了一个晚上才写好，结果错误百出，真不愧是小菜鸟…………

What kind of leader would most likely to be success? The character of an ideal leader is not always stable, people who proved to be great political leader or business leader basically share different traits. However, there is a saying that only the one who can achieve the goals he or she ask the others to accomplish can be accepted as a leader. While in some cases it may make sense, in general I suspect this saying for the following reasons.

First of all, we all understand that the development of the society cannot exist without specialized production and division of labor. One should focus on the thing that he or she can best deal with, and work in the field that need the person most. If a leader has to do everything better than the stuff, then the leader should be in place of the worker. Moreover, the obligation of the leader, nowadays, is to organize the team and make the members cooperate better. In other words, in modern organization, the leader actually plays the role of an organizer and an inter-human relation dealer. The trait that leaders are required to have is the ability to manage relationship among the members of the organization and that between the organization one locates in and other organizations. In that case, any specialized skills are useless and needless. So why do we ask the leader to learn and master these useless skills? 例子例子！~~

Secondly, even if a person more likes a leader with superior skills in one's own field, he has to accept the fact that such a qualified leader is too hard to find. Even in a company that has minimum scale, there are people with different education backgrounds and various job skills. Only because the speed you tide the house cannot exceed that of your stuff, you should never be the head of the company. Don't you think the case is ridiculous? Therefore, although the standard sounds great in justifying leader, it is easier said than done. With the prosperity of the multinational company，the structure in a company becomes more and more complicated, and the staff of the company becomes larger. The managers of such company might even have no idea of how many skills that are mastered by the stuff, not to say to perform the same task.

Admittedly, when the leader can show his superior skill in doing the same task that he expect the others to perform, he will surely win himself applause and respect（esteem）However, he may have other ways to establish that prestige, and as far as he can bring the organization interest and triumph, it does not matter whether he has a specialized skill.

In a word, a leader does not have to be as skilled as his subordinate staff, and the most important task of the leader is to handle the inter-human relations beat and make people cooperate better. It is problematic to conclude that only the managers that can show superior ability in doing specific tasks is qualified for a leader.

这个题目我不知道应该用什么例子好，还请有思路的nn告之指正

以下是引用xingyech在2005-7-16 21:05:00的发言：

issue33

33. “People are likely to accept as a leader only someone who has demonstrated an ability to perform the same tasks that he or she expects others to perform.”

花了一个晚上才写好，结果错误百出，真不愧是小菜鸟…………

好象不符合逻辑哦

However, there is a saying that only the one who can achieve the goals he or she ask the others to accomplish can be accepted as a leader. While in some cases it may make sense, in general I suspect this saying for the following reasons.

这个是固定用法吗？

the ability to manage relationship among the members of the organization and that between the organization one locates in and other organizations. In that case, any specialized skills are

应该是单数吧？

useless and needless. So why do we ask the leader to learn and master these useless skills? 例子例子！~~你已经从一个general的层面上给了例子啊

这句话不大懂？

Don't you think the case is ridiculous? Therefore, although the standard sounds great in justifying leader, it is easier said than done. With the prosperity of the multinational company，the structure in a company becomes more and more complicated, and the 似乎应该加上the volume staff of the company becomes larger. The managers of such company might even have no idea of how many skills that are mastered by the stuff, not to say to perform the same task.

In a word, a leader does not have to be as skilled as his subordinate staff, 多余 and the most important task of the leader is to handle the inter-human relations beat and make people cooperate better. It is problematic to conclude that only the managers that can show superior ability in doing specific tasks is qualified for a leader.

这个题目我不知道应该用什么例子好，还请有思路的nn告之指正

写的一点都不菜啊！很好拉。思路不错啊，注意下细节。至于例子举general的就好了实在想不出来就来编个中国公司好了。

写作的时候我总是觉得想表达的意思很难用英语说出来，要么就是逻辑混乱。尤其是觉得没有例子的时候连思路也连贯不了了。

是不是结构还是最重要的呢？我上次就是结构轻重不分，最后竟然还得4。5真算运气