Questions 80-81 are based on the following.
The program to control the entry of illegal drugs into the country was a failure in 1987. If the program had been successful, the wholesale price of most illegal drugs would not have dropped substantially in 1987.
81. The argument in the passage would be most seriously weakened if it were true that
(A) in 1987 smugglers of illegal drugs, as a group, had significantly more funds at their disposal than did the country’s customs agents
(B) domestic production of illegal drugs increased substantially in 1987
(C) the author’s statements were made in order to embarrass the officials responsible for the drug-control program
(D) in 1987 illegal drugs entered the country by a different set of routes than they did in 1986（B）
(E) the country’s citizens spent substantially more money on illegal drugs in 1987 than they did in 1986
不理解为什么OG会说: an increase in the amount of money spent(choice E) also provide evidence that the program did fail, given the low price level.
我觉得E的错误在于原题目是说wholesale price, 这里说citizen spending, 是无关的, 请NN解惑.
我觉得更好的解释是与题目无关
题干是，非法药的进口会导致药价的下降。
E说居民在非法药上花了更多的钱，无关
无关
是不是因为1987年居民花的钱多了, 如果考虑也有可能买的数量多的因素才不能肯定说价格肯定上涨, 进而不能说明是否非法进口药品得到控制. 但是我觉得即使是这样, 如果说数量多了, 但还是说明了非法药品数量多了啊.
还是不理解为什么OG就直接说是无关, 请NN在详细解释一下, 感谢了.
是不是因为1987年居民花的钱多了, 如果考虑也有可能买的数量多的因素才不能肯定说价格肯定上涨, 进而不能说明是否非法进口药品得到控制. 但是我觉得即使是这样, 如果说数量多了, 但还是说明了非法药品数量多了啊.
还是不理解为什么OG就直接说是无关, 请NN在详细解释一下, 感谢了.
我觉得OG的解释是对的。E supports the argument.
题目说illegal drug'price decreases,结合E（居民在illegal drug上的花费增加了），可见，居民购买了更多的illegal drug，而更多的illegal drug是哪来的呢，是从国外近来的。所以E证明program failed。
请指教
但是原文是wholesale price下降, 选项里面是citizen对应的零售价, 这两个应该还不是直接的联系吧, 难道说OG默认了这两个的联动关系? 不是不可以随便加条件吗?
顶!
这个应该不算是过分的思维扩张，可看作是常识：批发价下降，零售价格也下降。
该选项说居民在非法毒品方面的开支增长了，意味着非法毒品的消费量增加了，而增加的可能之一就是非法毒品的入境数量增加了。
所以具有加强的可能性。
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |