ChaseDream

标题: [讨论]og138-关于propose的用法 [打印本页]

作者: tania    时间: 2005-7-15 10:01
标题: [讨论]og138-关于propose的用法

138. Senator Lasker has proposed legislation requiring that employers



should retain all older workers indef­initely or show just cause for



dismissal.



(A)  that employers should retain all older workers



(B)  that all older workers be retained by employers



(C)  the retaining by employers of all older workers



(D)  employers' retention of all older workers


       (E)employers to retain all older workers


答案为E,我对答案没有任何异议。但是对句子中的propose 的用法有两点不明,希望大家帮忙。


第一个问题:我理解题目中的propose是“提出”的意思,也就是下面longman解释中的第2个意思:


1
▶SUGGEST◀
[transitive] formal to suggest something as a plan or course of action
ᅳsee also proposal the changes currently proposed by the local planning authorities the proposed budget cuts
propose that
In his speech he proposed that the UN should set up an emergency centre for the environment.
propose doing something
The report also proposes extending the motorway.
2
▶MEETING◀
[transitive]to formally suggest a course of action at a meeting and ask people to vote on it
propose a motion/amendment/resolution etc


The resolution was proposed by the chairman of the International Committee.
propose somebody for something
Mr Leesom proposed Mrs Banks for the position of Treasurer (=he suggested formally that she should be the treasurer) .
3
▶THEORY◀
[transitive] to suggest an idea, method etc as an answer to a scientific question or as a better way of doing something
A number of theories have been proposed to explain the phenomenon.
4
▶INTEND◀
[transitive] formal to intend to do something
propose to do something
How does he propose to deal with the situation?
propose doing something
We still don't know how the company proposes raising the money.


可是根据longman的例句和第二个意思的用法,propose后面怎么可以用requiring呢?


第二个问题:propose后面如果接doing 的话,都是propose doing sth. 。没有propose sth. doing的用法啊?题目中的用法该如何理解呢?


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-7-15 10:01:13编辑过]

作者: likui    时间: 2005-7-15 11:22

proposed legislation requiring


这里面requiring是修饰legislation的,而不是和propose构成什么结构;是典型的现在分词的用法,见刘振民《GMAT语法改错精解》P107“若是法令或权力的内容,可用现在分词短语来对该法令或权力进行限定,如the regulation banning smoking”


作者: tania    时间: 2005-7-18 08:37

哦!明白了!


thx






欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3