ChaseDream

标题: 求问一道题：OG16 31 [打印本页]

作者: metina7 时间: 2015-10-19 16:01
标题: 求问一道题：OG16 31
31. The remarkable similarity of Thule artifacts throughout a vast region can, in part,
be explained as a very rapid movement of people from one end of North America to
the other.
(A) The remarkable similarity of Thule artifacts throughout a vast region
can, in part, be explained as
(B) Thule artifacts being remarkably similar throughout a vast region, one
explanation is
(C) That Thule artifacts are remarkably similar throughout a vast region is,
in part, explainable as
(D) One explanation for the remarkable similarity of Thule artifacts
throughout a vast region is that there was
(E) Throughout a vast region Thule artifacts are remarkably similar, with
one explanation for this being
正确答案是D，想问为什么不能选A呢？

作者: virnnie 时间: 2015-10-19 18:24
A意思不对。就相当于Thule文物的相似处可以被解释为一种快速迁移。【相似处是迁移】
其实应该是对这么显著的相似处的一种可能的解释是，这里有迁移。

作者: metina7 时间: 2015-10-19 18:33

virnnie 发表于 2015-10-19 18:24
A意思不对。就相当于Thule文物的相似处可以被解释为一种快速迁移。【相似处是迁移】
其实应该是对这么显著 ...

哦~明白了~谢谢！

作者: 不如前 时间: 2015-10-24 22:05
想知道为什么OG说B的主语不明确？

作者: 木子考拉 时间: 2015-11-2 15:55
1.我也有很多疑问为什么OG上对A的解释是相似是迁移的结果这与相似是迁移有什么区别吗？
2.关于B选项，有NN能解释一下吗？虽然知道他不对，可是就是不知道怎么说它到底如何错的

关于B选项前面这个修饰语还有些疑惑，being前面的 Thule artifacts 在语法结构上是做什么的，暗示了什么。这个可以把这个Thule artifacts being remarkably similar throughout a vast region当initial modifier来看到吗？ Being在这里到底是什么性质？

跪求解答呀！！！！！！

作者: 快乐女孩 时间: 2015-12-8 21:13
我很想问下C，THAT 引导了一个主语从句，所以is是对的呀，that引导的主语从句表示一个事，这个事被解释为后面的内容，怎么不对了呢？避免了A中similarity 与 movement 错。

作者: fankndawn 时间: 2015-12-9 01:09

木子考拉发表于 2015-11-2 15:55
1.我也有很多疑问为什么OG上对A的解释是相似是迁移的结果这与相似是迁移有什么区别吗？
2.关于B选项 ...

Heavy commitment by an executive to a course of action, especially if it has worked well in the past, makes it likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they do appear.

A. Heavy commitment by an executive to a course of action, especially if it has worked well in the past, makes it likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they do appear.
B. An executive who is heavily committed to a course of action, especially one that worked well in the past, makes missing signs of incipient trouble or misinterpreting ones likely when they do appear.
C. An executive who is heavily committed to a course of action is likely to miss or misinterpret signs of incipient trouble when they do appear, especially if it has worked well in the past.
D. Executives’ being heavily committed to a course of action, especially if it has worked well in the past, makes them likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpreting them when they do appear.
E. Being heavily committed to a course of action, especially one that has worked well in the past, is likely to make an executive miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they do appear.

除了这道其他being都是错的，因为og 的解释是wordy
A
我个人的看法是 explained as 有逻辑错误。
explained by 比较好理解，有因果关系

作者: fankndawn 时间: 2015-12-9 01:12

快乐女孩发表于 2015-12-8 21:13
我很想问下C，THAT 引导了一个主语从句，所以is是对的呀，that引导的主语从句表示一个事，这个事被解释为后 ...

og里指出 that和is 的错误，
我也觉的在语法上是对的。
但是这里和 a的错误一样， explained as 我认为替换成explained by更好表达两者的；联系

作者: mnimi 时间: 2015-12-9 10:51

快乐女孩发表于 2015-12-8 21:13
我很想问下C，THAT 引导了一个主语从句，所以is是对的呀，that引导的主语从句表示一个事，这个事被解释为后 ...

(C) That Thule artifacts are remarkably similar throughout a vast region is,
in part, explainable as
此处主要是explainable as的问题，短语使用不当。be explainable as 的意思里有与什么相同的意思，此处应为因果关系。可用其他词代替，比如be explained by，或者改成D,更加清楚。

此种语义细节的辨析还是需要细致体会的。

作者: 快乐女孩 时间: 2015-12-12 11:37

mnimi 发表于 2015-12-9 10:51
(C) That Thule artifacts are remarkably similar throughout a vast region is,
in part, explainable a ...

好厉害，谢谢你啦~~

作者: 快乐女孩 时间: 2015-12-12 11:37

fankndawn 发表于 2015-12-9 01:12
og里指出 that和is 的错误，
我也觉的在语法上是对的。
但是这里和 a的错误一样， explained as 我认为替 ...

谢谢啦~~~

作者: 快乐女孩 时间: 2015-12-12 11:40

mnimi 发表于 2015-12-9 10:51
(C) That Thule artifacts are remarkably similar throughout a vast region is,
in part, explainable a ...

“Like (A), this version of the sentence equates the similarity of artifacts
with the movement of people, when a causal connection is what is intended”这是OG里对C的解释，该如何理解呢？

作者: 快乐女孩 时间: 2015-12-12 11:41

fankndawn 发表于 2015-12-9 01:12
og里指出 that和is 的错误，
我也觉的在语法上是对的。
但是这里和 a的错误一样， explained as 我认为替 ...

“Like (A), this version of the sentence equates the similarity of artifacts
with the movement of people, when a causal connection is what is intended”这是OG里对C的解释，该如何理解呢？这个你能理解么？

作者: mnimi 时间: 2015-12-12 17:20

快乐女孩发表于 2015-12-12 11:40
“Like (A), this version of the sentence equates the similarity of artifacts
with the movement of ...

就是我说的呀，OG的意思是此处用as表达的是与xx相同的意思，但事实上此处应为因果关系。

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)