ChaseDream

标题: AI138集思广益中参加讨论提高自己惠及他人 [打印本页]

作者: judydongxueni 时间: 2005-7-13 23:28
标题: AI138集思广益中参加讨论提高自己惠及他人

138. “Although restricting public access can help protect national parks and historical sites, in fact there should be few, if any, such restrictions because these places were intended for everyone to use.”
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above. Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.

1Giving everybody the access to the national parks and historical sites is not the only intention or the pivotal intention for the establishment of them.
2It is also irrational to impose a lot of restrictions on the access to the national parks and historical sites.
3It is not an either-or choice. Between the two ends, there is a middle ground. Adjusting both the restriction and the free access can make good result.

[此贴子已经被作者于2005-7-13 23:35:44编辑过]

作者: ethyl 时间: 2005-7-14 18:01

大量的人去名胜不过是为了观光旅游，不正当的人文资源开发不仅无益于对名胜的保护，相反倒是鼓动了名胜开发的产业化，从而对名胜古迹的环境生态造成不利影响，从这方面来说，政府应该制定适当的规则约束社会的行为，指导名胜古迹的保护……

太过严厉的约束则会据游人于大门之外，不利于对游人进行直观的人文教育，拉远了名胜古迹与社会的距离；试想，如果因为要保护长城而将其围起来不允许游人参观，那么，长城所代表的那种民族气魄与精神如何得到最为直接的体现和弘扬呢？

作者: 伊彤 时间: 2005-7-30 02:46

厉害，可是我还是不知道如何落笔！！

作者: 伊彤 时间: 2005-7-30 02:49

1，为了实现其价值

2，利于文化教育

3，承认有适当的保护

作者: judydongxueni 时间: 2005-7-30 07:56
呵呵这个过程是很痛苦的，但是一定要写哦！练练就好了，先不限时把文写出来然后慢慢限时。

作者: 伊彤 时间: 2005-7-31 07:09

谢谢斑竹！！

不过呢，现在我写的作文基本上是500字左右，AA可能达到700字，写的时间也很长，还有20天就考试了，我很怕考试的事后不够时间

作者: happyfish0517 时间: 2005-7-31 07:33

关于awa来不及的问题,建议上手先把开头段，结尾段写完（利用模版），还有中间几段的开头第一句话。然后再补充具体论述，防止万一最后没写完，至少也是个完整的文章，有头有尾...不至于冤枉扣分...

a za a za fighting...

作者: liujiantyxf 时间: 2005-12-22 11:35
顶

作者: ruiheh 时间: 2012-1-1 21:03
We can only realize the value of historical sites and national park if the site is not destroyed. Give example of destroyed sites

How can nature be natural if access is not restricted? The consequences of allowing unrestricted accesses to these valuable sites is immeasurable. People can ... < give extreme cases >

Because they - national parks and historical sites - belongs to everyone, protections are needed. Else, some people may take advantage of the less / non-restrictive site and exploit the sites for their own gains. Give examples...

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)