ChaseDream

标题: OG225 没有天理的平行啊! [打印本页]

作者: Cassandra    时间: 2005-7-12 16:02
标题: OG225 没有天理的平行啊!

225. Minnesota is the only one of the contiguous forty-eight states that still has a sizable wolf population. and where this predator remains the archenemy of cattle and sheep.


(A)  that still has a sizable wolf population, and where


(B)  that still has a sizable wolf population, where


(C)  that still has a sizable population of wolves, and where


(D)  where the population of wolves is still sizable;


(E)   where there is still a sizable population of wolves and where


In choices A and C, the construction that still has ..., and where modifies Minnesota with clauses that are not gram­matically parallel. In choice B, the omission of and illogically makes the where ... clause modify wolf population rather than Minnesota--that is, choice B says in effect that the wolf population is where the wolf remains the archenemy of cattle and sheep. Choice D is grammatically constructed, but it lacks a conjunction that establishes a logical relation between the clauses; since Minnesota as a grammatical subject is separated from the clause following the semicolon, the statement there need not even pertain to Minnesota. In E, the best choice, the parallel construction of where ... and where ... allows both clauses to modify Minnesota.


想不通AC怎么不平行了, 难道说定语从句和状语从句不可以平行吗?


作者: Cassandra    时间: 2005-7-13 08:28
顶!
作者: jnlvo    时间: 2005-7-13 09:49

平行是越对称越好,that和where形式上就不对称, 且that开头的定语从句的先行词在句中的成分和where开头的也不一样。


作者: 小女公子    时间: 2005-7-13 10:44
where there可以看作固定搭配
作者: Cassandra    时间: 2005-7-13 11:28

谢谢楼上两位的回答, 但是我觉得用that引导从句去修饰states也挺和逻辑的啊?


另外感觉有的时候用where, 有的时候用that, 版主可否讲解一下究竟怎么区别? 谢谢!


作者: jnlvo    时间: 2005-7-13 11:40
where相当于in/at/on which等。sth.where中的先行词sth.作后面从句的状语(in/at/on)sth. ,而that前的先行词一般作后面从句的主语或是宾语。楼主可以再参考下语法书,了解更详细的内容。
作者: Cassandra    时间: 2005-7-13 12:45
谢谢版主热心解答! 我再看看.
作者: likui    时间: 2005-7-13 20:28
既然要和that---平行,那么AC中间where前面的逗号就不可以要了。
作者: langbaobao1031    时间: 2008-1-5 23:35

弱弱的问,定从,that或者where,可以跳跃修饰the only one么?定从跳跃修饰好像不大长见哦。


作者: elaine1031    时间: 2009-7-6 19:31
UP
作者: sayhello1983    时间: 2009-7-6 21:44
个人感觉,如果考题是做两个并列或者比较的句子。 90%以上都是考结构,成分上对称,或者代词正确。
作者: ForexFund    时间: 2009-7-6 23:47

补充:

不同功能的定语从句不能并列,因为关系词在定语从句中充当不同的成分,除that和where不能并列外:

n.+where...and in which不能并列;

n.+where...and who不能并列。


作者: mikecello    时间: 2009-7-7 00:54
Confusing Parts.  Need to be better grasped.

Thx for the complementary opinion, Fund!





欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3