ChaseDream

标题: GWD-10-15 [打印本页]

作者: jerry1121 时间: 2005-7-12 11:10
标题: GWD-10-15

没有人问过?自己实在太弱了

Q15:
Which of the following most logically completes the argument below?
Although the number of large artificial satellites orbiting the Earth is small compared to
the number of small pieces of debris in orbit, the large satellites interfere more seriously
with telescope observations because of the strong reflections they produce. Because
many of those large satellites have ceased to function, the proposal has recently been
made to eliminate interference from nonfunctioning satellites by exploding them in space.
This proposal, however, is ill conceived, since _______.

A. many nonfunctioning satellites remain in orbit for years

B. for satellites that have ceased to function, repairing them while they are in orbit
would be prohibitively expensive

C. there are no known previous instances of satellites’ having been exploded on
purpose

D. the only way to make telescope observations without any interference from debris
in orbit is to use telescopes launched into extremely high orbits around the Earth

E. a greatly increased number of small particles in Earth’s orbit would result in a blanket of reflections that would make certain valuable telescope observations impossible

为什么是E不是D?

E说的 particles 是由于exploding产生的吗?题目好象没有说明啊.感觉E是无关啊?而D说要避免干扰只有use telescopes launched into extremely high orbits around the Earth.也就是说 exploding不管用.

请NN指点.

作者: jerry1121 时间: 2005-7-13 09:25

顶.帮帮我吧

作者: 携隐 时间: 2005-7-13 10:12
D只是给出了一个信息，这个信息是有利还是有害，你不能从原文得出啊。

作者: jerry1121 时间: 2005-7-13 10:26

以下是引用携隐在2005-7-13 10:12:00的发言：
D只是给出了一个信息，这个信息是有利还是有害，你不能从原文得出啊。

不能同意,我有2个问题

1. 原文说要减少干扰.D不正说了唯一的方法来减少干扰,从而得出别的方法不正确吗?

2. 怎么得出E中的颗粒就是爆炸产生的呢?

请NN指点.我月底就考了

作者: deepshock_man 时间: 2005-7-13 11:16

题目是问:This proposal, however, is ill conceived, since.......

选项D 给出了the only way to make telescope observations without any interference, 但是没有说明为什么 explode nonfunctioning satellites 的proposal是ill conceived, 所以-无关

选项E a greatly increased number of small particles in Earth’s orbit 正是给出了如果explode nonfunctioning satellites 的后果就是make certain valuable telescope observations impossible来说明the proposal is ill conceived.

作者: jerry1121 时间: 2005-7-13 11:52
请问 ill conceived 在这里怎么解释啊

作者: deepshock_man 时间: 2005-7-13 20:27

我的理解是: ill conceived = poorly conceived, 就是argue那个proposal是在不缜密的构思下得出的,所以如果实施的话就会带来危害, 正如选项E所描述的情况

作者: jerry1121 时间: 2005-7-13 22:04

以下是引用deepshock_man在2005-7-13 20:27:00的发言：

我的理解是: ill conceived = poorly conceived, 就是argue那个proposal是在不缜密的构思下得出的,所以如果实施的话就会带来危害, 正如选项E所描述的情况

这样我就明白了。谢谢

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)