1. The Wallerstein study indicates that even after a decade young men and women still experience some of the effects of a divorce occurring when a child.
(A) occurring when a child
(B) occurring when children
(C) that occurred when a child
(D) that occurred when they were children
(E) that has occurred as each was a child
Choice D is best. Also, each was does not properly refer to men and women.
OG问什么说不可以用each was呢? 查了大全里面其它的关于each的题目, 基本都是由于each+are这种单复搭配的错误, 但是这里已经用了was, 问什么还是说不可以呢?
each+be+n单数要一致:-)
这里的men and women出问题了
此题做ＯＧ一遍时，很容易就选对了．二遍时有了下面红字的影响，不要把两个不同的 earthquake搞成了一个．此题中men 和women的divorce一般不是同一个，所以就排除了D，选了E.
199. Because the Earth's crust is more solid there and thus better able to transmit shock waves, an earthquake
of a given magnitude typically devastates an area 100 times greater in the eastern United States than it
does in the West.
(A) of a given magnitude typically devastates an area 100 times greater in the eastern United States than it
does in the West
(B) of a given magnitude will typically devastate 100 times the area if it occurs in the eastern United States
instead of the West
(C) will typically devastate 100 times the area in the eastern United States than one of comparable
magnitude occurring in the West
(D) in the eastern United States will typically devastate an area 100 times greater than will a quake of
comparable magnitude occurring in the West
(E) that occurs in the eastern United States will typically devastate 100 times more area than if it occurred
with comparable magnitude in the West
Choices A, B, and E use it incorrectly to suggest that the same quake strikes both the eastern and
the western United States. In choice C, 700 times the area... than is unidiomatic.
To 女公子: 好像我问的不是这个意思.
To Colin33: 你说的有启发, 但不知道这里的each应该可以理解为each of them吧, 为什么不可以指代men and women, 兄弟解释的不是特别的理解, 麻烦了.
如果修改为each of them is a child是不是就可以了？
应该是平行的一种吧
n于n的平行，yong men and women和they
是一种平行，句子中的所有代词都应该能够找到对应所指代的名词，并保持数的一致。
我决定这个问题不是简单的对应, OG里面另一题就是用each指代复数的:
195. Dr. Tonegawa won the Nobel Prize for discovering how the body can constantly change its genes to fashion a seeming unlimited number of antibodies. each specifically targeted at an invading microbe or foreign substance.
(A) seeming unlimited number of antibodies, each specifically targeted at
(B) seeming unlimited number of antibodies, each targeted specifically to
(C) seeming unlimited number of antibodies, all specifically targeted at
(D) seemingly unlimited number of antibodies, all of them targeted specifically to
(E) seemingly unlimited number of antibodies, each targeted specifically at
Choices A, B, and C incorrectly use the adjective form seeming to modify the participial adjective unlimited. B also uses the unidiomatic preposition to instead of the correct at after targeted, while C violates sense by having all the antibodies specifically targeted at an, that is, one, invading microbe or substance. Choice D correctly uses seemingly, but it repeats B's incorrect use of targeted to and C's illogical all... specifically. Only E, the best choice, correctly uses the form seemingly to modify unlimited, the correct preposition, at, with targeted, and the logically correct each, which links the specific antibodies to specific microbes or substances.
为什么OG1的就说不行? 不理解．
我对OG1中each was理解是，each不能指代men and women。
至于195题用each是因为后面有单数名词an invading microbe ..., 需要用单数主语连接
会不会不是因为each不能指代pl.,而是因为each不能指代pl.and pl.?
如果说换成each of them可以, 我觉得each本身去指代也没有什么问题, 不理解!!!
个人认为是divorce的原因。在这里，虽然用a divorce,但是它是指所有这些人经历的divorce,所以不能简单的翻译成一次离婚。因此在divorce occur 的时候，就无法与each这样的词匹配，而应该用they
欢迎指正
我也有同感，觉得E选项中的each没有任何的语法错误啊
为什么在OG解释中说each不行呢？
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |