ChaseDream

标题: ＯＧ　１０ [打印本页]

作者: kate_in_usa 时间: 2005-7-9 00:29
标题: ＯＧ　１０

请问为什么　OG48篇切磋讨论链接　中没有ＯＧ　第１０篇的问题，我在阅读区中搜索都搜索不到，是没有人问过这篇文章吗？可是我后面有些东西看不太明白，想请教．

第１０篇说到美国的公司寻求进口保护的政策反遭一些外国驻美公司的利用，下文为全文最后一段：

Perhaps the most brazen case occurred when the ITC

investigated allegations that Canadian companies were

injuring the United States salt industry by dumping

(35) rock salt, used to de-ice roads. The bizarre aspect of the

complaint was that a foreign conglomerate with United

States operations was crying for help against a United

States company with foreign operations. The “United

States” company claiming injury was a subsidiary of a

(40) Dutch conglomerate, while the “Canadian” companies

included a subsidiary of a Chicago firm that was the

second-largest domestic producer of rock salt.

对于这一段的主要意思我不太理解，麻烦大侠解释一下．

如果这篇文章以前有人讨论过，请附上ＬＩＮＫ，我自己去看，谢谢．　

作者: kate_in_usa 时间: 2005-7-9 12:04
求助啊~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

作者: wangyu73cn 时间: 2005-7-9 13:35

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=25&ID=113446&replyID=&skin=0

Perhaps the most brazen case occurred when the ITC investigated allegations that Canadian companies were injuring the LACE>United StatesLACE> salt industry by dumping (35) rock salt, used to de-ice roads.
本段提出了一个最为典型的例子。

The bizarre aspect of the complaint was that a foreign conglomerate with United States operations was crying for help against a United States company with foreign operations.
该案例的特异之处在于，一家有美国业务的外国集团，针对一家有国外业务的美国本土公司，提请保护。就是说美国保护主义的大棒却被外国利用了。

The “United States” company claiming injury was a subsidiary of a (40) Dutch conglomerate, while the “Canadian” companies included a subsidiary of a LACE>ChicagoLACE> firm that was the second-largest domestic producer of rock salt.
所谓的控方，“美国”公司是荷兰集团的一家分支，而所谓的被控方“加拿大”公司拥有美国公司的一个分支机构。

[此贴子已经被作者于2005-7-9 13:42:28编辑过]

作者: kate_in_usa 时间: 2005-7-10 14:36
太感谢斑主啦,你解释的真清楚!

作者: cccccc0 时间: 2006-10-13 16:47
好详细~~

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)