ChaseDream

标题: og 16 sc 113 [打印本页]

作者: Lauraliang 时间: 2015-10-3 14:21
标题: og 16 sc 113
Marconi’s conception of the radio was as a substitute for the telephone, a tool for
private conversation; instead, it is precisely the opposite, a tool for communicating
with a large, public audience.
(A) Marconi’s conception of the radio was as a substitute for the telephone,
a tool for private conversation; instead, it is
(B) Marconi conceived of the radio as a substitute for the telephone, a tool
for private conversation, but which is
(C) Marconi conceived of the radio as a tool for private conversation that
could substitute for the telephone; instead, it has become
(D) Marconi conceived of the radio to be a tool for private conversation, a
substitute for the telephone, which has become
(E) Marconi conceived of the radio to be a substitute for the telephone, a
tool for private conversation, other than what it is,

知道其他的不正确，但不知道为什么选C， that 在C中指代的是谁，a tool 还是private conversation, 要是临近修饰的话，那就应该是conversation，那这样的话这个选项好像就有问题了。

作者: elusive 时间: 2016-4-13 11:08
B里面a tool for private conversation修饰的是a substitute ，应该是修饰修饰radio。此外不同从句应该句子完整，使用which导致句子不完整。
D里面应该是conceived as而不是to be，此外同位语的错误同b。a substitute for the telephone修饰tool。此外which不能修饰一句话。
E里面同位语同错。conceive as。
A里面同位语同错。
C用了that从句修改了同位语错误。conceive as修改了 to be的错误。

作者: vi.len 时间: 2016-7-31 21:00

elusive 发表于 2016-4-13 11:08
B里面a tool for private conversation修饰的是a substitute ，应该是修饰修饰radio。此外不同从句应该句子 ...

那第二句，instead，it has become不会出现指代不清的现象吗？it应该指代radio，但是根据就近原则又指代telephone，这样直接用it不会造成歧义吗？

作者: vi.len 时间: 2016-7-31 23:35
研究一晚上…我来自问自答了…楼楼的提问，that从句和for private conversation一起修饰a tool.
it指代radio，因为Ron说，pronoun ambiguity isn't always -- or even usually -- a fatal error。

作者: elusive 时间: 2016-9-12 04:57

vi.len 发表于 2016-7-31 21:00
那第二句，instead，it has become不会出现指代不清的现象吗？it应该指代radio，但是根据就近原则又指代t ...

那个it并不是在所用情况下都是代指不明。
你假设it就近代指是错误的。
是不是代指不明要看语境，没有一个统一的标准来衡量。

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)