ChaseDream

标题: 求解OG Verbal Review 2016 SC第26 题 [打印本页]

作者: jiangqz    时间: 2015-9-28 15:08
标题: 求解OG Verbal Review 2016 SC第26 题
OG VR-2016 SC-26题是这样的:
Analysts believe that whereas bad decisions by elected leaders can certainly hurt
the economy,  no administration can really be said to control or manage all of  the
complex and interrelated forces that determine the nation’ s economic strength.
(A) no administration can really be said to control
(B) no administration can be said that it really controls
(C) that no administration can really be said to control
(D) that no administration can really be said that it controls
(E) that it cannot be said that any administration really controls

我最后排除剩下A和B。OG解释说B不对是应为can be said to 才是正确的语法,can be said that...是不符合语法的。
想请教这里怎么分析A和B的句子结构,可以知道can be said to的语法合理?为什么can be said that不合理?
我选B 是觉得really应该修饰control而不是be said,这个分析误区在哪里?

不用回答我的每个问题啦~帮忙分析一下这道题,说说你的思路也很感激的!谢谢!!O(∩_∩)O


作者: Gil_0_    时间: 2015-9-28 20:43
say的被動語態很蹩腳,因為改成正常語態就是say sth that,這不是正常的書面語用法。而be said to是一個習慣語用法,表示據說

至於你提到的really,其實只要和修飾動詞蘸上,放哪兒都行。雖然從語義上看它改變了句子的原意可以作為一個排錯點,不過無關大雅。

真正的考點問題在習語用法。不過若B選項say形式正確,我依然建議你選A,因為這時候考點就在於修飾語,而這時候的原則就是不能改變句子原意

總而言之,SC的選項給了你最好的做題工具,好好體會出題點,順著GMAT的思路來。

作者: jiangqz    时间: 2015-9-28 22:36
Gil_0_ 发表于 2015-9-28 20:43
say的被動語態很蹩腳,因為改成正常語態就是say sth that,這不是正常的書面語用法。而be said to是一個習 ...

啊谢谢你!谢谢你回复的清楚又详细!O(∩_∩)O谢谢
作者: Lanmie    时间: 2015-9-28 22:49
这道题最快的方法是排除,control和manage要平行~因此controls的都错~CDE错误太明显了~




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3