90. Current legislation that requires designated sections for smokers and nonsmokers on the premises of privately owned businesses is an intrusion into the private sector that cannot be justified. The fact that studies indicate that nonsmokers might be harmed by inhaling the smoke from others’ cigarettes is not the main issue. Rather, the main issue concerns the government’s violation of the right of private businesses to determine their own policies and rules.
Which of the following is a principle that, if accepted, could enable the conclusion to be properly drawn?
(A) Government intrusion into the policies and rules of private businesses is justified only when individuals might be harmed.
(B) The right of individuals to breathe safe air supersedes the right of businesses to be free from government intrusion.
(C) The right of businesses to self-determination overrides whatever right or duty the government may have to protect the individual.
(D) It is the duty of private businesses to protect employees from harm in the workplace.
(E) Where the rights of businesses and the duty of government conflict, the main issue is finding a successful compromise.
d为什么不对呢？
本人是cr菜鸟，请大家多照顾照顾
显然你没明白题目吗.
政府要求私人地方划分出来吸烟区与非吸烟区.
要你论证政府不对.
划分区域对大家来讲是好事,政府的失误在于他越权拉.
Current legislation that requires designated sections for smokers and nonsmokers on the premises of privately owned businesses is an intrusion into the private sector that cannot be justified
能帮忙解释一下这句话的句子结构(主谓宾）吗？that cannot be justified修饰什么？
that cannot be justified 修饰 an intrusion
句子主语: current legislation 后接that引导的定语从句
谓语/be动词：is
表语：an instrusion into ... 后接that引导的定语从句
lawyerme: thank you very much!
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |