ChaseDream
标题: 关于with结构的修饰问题 [打印本页]
作者: remona9t 时间: 2005-6-29 16:02
标题: 关于with结构的修饰问题
最近查了很多with结构的修饰问题,也看了语法知识点关于with的讨论内容,有的nn也总结的很好,但最近做了gwd的题,发现里面出现了一种with的用法,在以前的总结中没有看到过(或者是我没有注意到),像请教一下大家:
Q29
For protection from the summer sun, the Mojave lived in open-sided, flat-topped dwellings known as shades, each a roof of poles and arrowweed supported by posts set in a rectangle.
- each a roof of poles and arrowweed
- each a roof of poles and arrowweed that are being
- with each being a roof of poles and arrowweed
- with roofs of poles and arrowweed to be
- with roofs of poles and arrowweed that are
gwd10-24
For the last five years the Dutch economy has grown faster than Britain, France, or Germany, with the unemployment rate having remained well below that of the other three countries.
- Britain, France, or Germany, with the unemployment rate having remained
- have those of Britain, France, or Germany, and the unemployment rate remaining
- have Britain, France, and Germany, and the unemployment rate has remained
- the economy of Britain, France, and Germany, with the unemployment rate that has remained
- the economies of Britain, France, and Germany, and the unemployment rate has remained
以上这两道题的结构都是:SVO, with+N. 结构,像这种介词短语在句尾,前面有逗号语主句分离,是否充当非限定性修饰成分,修饰的是否是前面紧跟的名词(如果是 a of b, 结构,则根据逻辑意思来判断修饰谁)?还是另有修饰的规则?到底应该优先修饰谁呢?
望NN予以解答!
[此贴子已经被作者于2005-6-29 16:02:53编辑过]
作者: crbeijing 时间: 2005-6-29 16:14
别太钻牛角尖。语法有规律,但运用时也很灵活。可以试试从句意判断。
作者: remona9t 时间: 2005-6-29 16:53
哎,可是这种题我还真是拿不准
作者: Avantasia 时间: 2005-6-29 19:42
with在句尾的非限定修饰实在不是一个好选择, 个人观点.
作者: remona9t 时间: 2005-6-30 12:34
我也觉得是,最近没有看到WITH在结尾,作为限定修饰有是正确答案的句子
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) |
Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |