ChaseDream

标题: 求教：OG16 SC 122 Originally developed for detecting air pollutes [打印本页]

作者: nancyyen 时间: 2015-9-14 11:36
标题: 求教：OG16 SC 122 Originally developed for detecting air pollutes

Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a technique called proton-induced X-ray

　　emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without

　　destroying it, is finding uses in medicine, archaeology, and criminology.

　　(A) Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a technique called proton-induced X-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it,

　　(B) Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, having the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it, a technique called proton-induced X-ray emission

　　(C) A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced X-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it,

　　(D) A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced X-ray emission, which has the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance quickly and without destroying it,

　　(E) A technique that was originally developed for detecting air pollutants and has the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance quickly and without destroying the substance, called proton-induced X-ray emission,

答案选A。 B选项比较清楚了，想请教前辈们，C/D/E的called proton-XXXXX这个结构为什么OG说要紧跟technique？感谢~

作者: zszszssz 时间: 2015-9-14 16:14
called proton-XXXXX 是过去分词作定语，曼哈顿和prep里都有 touch rule，就是作为定语的修饰语不能距离它修饰的名次距离过远，否则会引起歧义等问题。因为这些定语，例如comma+which，都是默认修饰离自己最近的那个名词（前方的）。

作者: nancyyen 时间: 2015-9-14 17:37

zszszssz 发表于 2015-9-14 16:14
called proton-XXXXX 是过去分词作定语，曼哈顿和prep里都有 touch rule，就是作为定语的修饰语不能距离它 ...

好的知道了！感谢！

作者: wxt_357 时间: 2015-9-22 17:51
借LZ的帖子问一下，我的点在A和C选项中出现的comma+which的用法。尽管A选项中各个modifier的排列已经尽合逻辑了，但就像2楼提到的touch rule，A选项中“...emission,which..."为什么就不会像C选项中的which一样，也有修饰emission的嫌疑呢？many thanks！

作者: nancyyen 时间: 2015-9-23 17:30

wxt_357 发表于 2015-9-22 17:51
借LZ的帖子问一下，我的点在A和C选项中出现的comma+which的用法。尽管A选项中各个modifier的排列已经尽合逻 ...

因为这两个东西是一个东西吧....

作者: muzishuixin 时间: 2016-2-27 23:57

wxt_357 发表于 2015-9-22 17:51
借LZ的帖子问一下，我的点在A和C选项中出现的comma+which的用法。尽管A选项中各个modifier的排列已经尽合逻 ...

同问，没有看明白og的说明

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)