ChaseDream

标题: 如何在比较句中找到比较的对象? [打印本页]

作者: eastdark    时间: 2015-8-26 11:54
标题: 如何在比较句中找到比较的对象?
在一个比较句中,总应该能找到比较的对象A和B,可是,当我看到一个陌生的句子(尤其是当我还不能理解这个句子的时候),我很难找到明确的比较的对象。也就是到底句子想要用什么和什么比,所以我就无法判断是否需要补充谓语,或者是否有可比性(我连在比什么都不知道)。
如下面几个例子,比较的对象可能是句子,也可能是状语,甚至可能在more... than中间。既然如此混乱,大家是如何准确的找到比较的对象的呢?

1. I become fat more because I seldom excercise than because I eat too much.
    比较的是两个Because。其中把Because I seldome exercise 和Because I eat too much比较了。
2. I invest stocks of US more frequently than stocks of China.
    比较的是stocks of US 和 stocks of China.
3. In Japan elderly people are treated with far greater respect than they are in most Western countries.
   比较的是elderly people are treated 和 they are (treated) in most Western countries
4. The investor is more likely to put money into tech stocks than into gold.
    比较的是into tech stocks 和into gold.


其中, 例1的比较对象在more 之后, 和than之后
例二中 more..than之间是一个副词,而比较的是主句的宾语,和than之后的名词
例三,是with 引导了一个比较级,比较的是两个句子。
例四,是两个状语进行比较






作者: alzn2765    时间: 2015-8-26 12:39
一个主谓宾句子中能比较的无外乎主语,宾语,宾补和状语。

你上面的例子中1,2,3,4比较的是全状语:1是原因状语从句(because vs because);2.是状语(more frequently vs less frequently);3是状语(with far greater respect vs with less respect );4是状语(to do vs to do);
2我觉得句子有点儿怪,如果句子肯定是正确的,就是你的理解错误。
如果比较的是宾语,句子应该是:I invest more stocks of US than stocks of China.

这个句子比较的是状语:I invest stocks of US more frequently than I invest stocks of China. 省略了I invest之后的形式。

作者: eastdark    时间: 2015-8-26 12:46
谢谢您的回答!

对于一个陌生的句子,如果想找到比较的对象,是否意味着要通过主语,宾语,宾补,状语一个个去试,看看哪个意思更符合逻辑?还是尽量先翻译成中文,然后试图从意思里面去猜测应该拿什么和什么比较?

另外,其中第二个例子,我是根据下一个题目自己造句的。我在看这道题的时候,就找不到比较的对象。。。。

Increases in the cost of energy, turmoil in the international money markets, and the steady erosion of the dollar have altered the investment strategies of United States corporations more radically than those of foreign corporations.

(A) altered the investment strategies of United States corporations more radically than those of
(B) altered the investment strategies of United States corporations more radically than
(C) altered the investment strategies of United States corporations more radically than they have
(D) radically altered the investment strategies of United States corporations more than
(E) radically altered the investment strategies of United States and
作者: eastdark    时间: 2015-8-26 12:57
另外,可不可能比较是主语+谓语?这时候,是不是就必须把谓语补充起来?
比如下面这个例句:

The mistakes children make in learning to speak tell linguists more about how children learn language than do the correct forms they use.

这一句,比较的应该就是(主语+谓语)吗?或者可以说这个比较的就是主语?难道还有单纯比较主语不需要加谓语的么。。





欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3