ChaseDream

标题: LSAT-10-4-13 [打印本页]

作者: 浪man    时间: 2005-6-16 14:20
标题: LSAT-10-4-13


13. This summer, Jennifer, who has worked at KVZ Manufacturing for just over three years, plans to spend with her family the entire four weeks of paid vacation to which she is entitled this year. Anyone who has worked at KVZ Manufacturing for between one and four years is automatically entitled to exactly three weeks paid vacation each year but can apply up to half of any vacation time that remains unused at the end of one year to the next year’s vacation.> >>>


If the statements above are all true, which one of the following must also be true on the basis of them?> >


(A) Jennifer did not use two weeks of the paid vacation time to which she was entitled past year.> >


(B) If Jennifer continues to work for KVZ Manufacturing, she will only be entitled to three weeks paid vacation next year.> >


(C) The majority of KVZ’s employees use each year all of the paid vacation time to which they are entitled.


(D) Last year Jennifer took only one week of the paid vacation time to which she was entitled.


(E) KVZ Manufacturing sometimes allows extra vacation time to employees who need to spend more time with their families.


我想问的是A也不一定对啊.比如,J请假是前一年的最后一星期和第二年的前3个星期那么不是A就不对了吗?是不是我想多了啊?


作者: likui    时间: 2005-6-16 23:19

我怎么觉得A和D都对呀。


作者: 浪man    时间: 2005-8-19 10:52
o 谢谢斑斑指点拉
作者: 况天佑    时间: 2005-8-19 13:21

我认为D是不对的,因为不能必然推出她只用了一个星期的假期啊,万一她三个星期都没有用呢?A答案只是说她用去年的两个星期来折抵啊,这就很合理了,我认为A答案是正确的。


另外,浪man要仔细看原文,文中只说到了上一年没有用的假期的一半可以用作下一年的,你所理解的用一个星期怎么可以呢。所以A答案正确。


作者: 懒猫必胜    时间: 2005-8-19 15:30

A是对的。



A说的是去年J有两个星期带薪假没有休。那么按照STIMULUS MATERIAL的意思这两周里就有一周能加到今年,而J在今年本来就有3周假,所以加起来是4周。



D的是J去年只休了一个星期的带薪假,而这是UNDETERMINED 的。因为去年J可能是跟前年积累下来的假期一起休的,所以虽然剩下两周没休,但是并不能因此断言去年她只休了一周。






欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3