91. “Government should establish regulations to reduce or eliminate any suspected health hazards in the environment, even when the scientific studies of these health hazards are incomplete or contradictory.＂
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above. Support your position with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.
呵呵大家的题号有必要统一哦。
看看这个可以不？
http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardID=26&ID=115552&page=1
感谢judydongxueni 的帮忙:
因为我的英文不好，所以请问题目的中文的翻译是什么？我有点不懂题目的意思。是否能将想法也改成中文？
是我写的不清楚吧？
1Health hazards should be eliminated or at least reduced for health is the first concern of all.
健康隐患有必要去除或至少减少，因为健康是（人们）首要的考虑问题。
2Even if the sentific studies of these hazards are incomplete, it is still critical for the government to reduce or eliminate them. We should take precautions rather than mend the fold after the sheep is lost.
即使是对这些隐患的科学研究仍然没有完成的时候，政府仍然应该减少或者消灭它们。我们要未雨绸缪不能亡羊补牢。
3The opponents may contend that it is imprudent and reckless for the government to act before the final conclusion has been made. For other prpblems, the government can wait, but for health hazards, I think, the government had better act as quickly as possible.
有些反对者可能会指出在最后的结论还没有出来之前就去做可能过于卤莽了。对其他的问题可能确实如此，但是对健康隐患，我想政府最好还是越快越好。
顶2楼--你真的很厉害！！！思路好清晰！我有个问题，这种咚咚通常都要举例，你说这个case有什么比较好一点的案例呢？谢谢！
恩比如sars
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |