ChaseDream

标题: [求助]og129 [打印本页]

作者: gigiga0118 时间: 2005-6-11 10:23
标题: [求助]og129

129. In an effort to reduce their inventories, Italian vintners have cut prices; their wines have been priced to sell. and they are.

(A) have been priced to sell, and they are

(B) are priced to sell, and they have

(C) are priced to sell, and they do

(D) are being priced to sell, and have

(E) had been priced to sell, and they have

關於這題,我的問題跟討論區比較不一樣,煩請大家給予意見

先不管代名詞問題,說說時態

當初我在選,我選A

(A) have been priced to sell, and they are

假設they指酒

照og的解法,我將a改成這樣,不知成不成

they have been priced to sell, and they are selling.

他們過去就已經被標價去販賣,(而現在)酒正在販賣

1.時態上說的過去嗎??

好像還是沒有C時態平衡的好,不過我覺得這樣的表達概念(現在完成式跟現在進行式,邏輯上是說的通的)

作者: jnlvo 时间: 2005-6-11 21:23

单独看are selling时态和逻辑可能能说得过去,但这种省略表达,OG认为是不合适的:In choice A, the omitted word is selling; in B, D, and E, it is sold. Neither of these forms corresponds properly to to sell earlier in the sentence.

作者: gigiga0118 时间: 2005-6-12 06:16

我不太白不合適在哪??

我一直覺的挺順的阿??

作者: 薰衣紫草 时间: 2005-6-12 10:35

again, 我不赞成改了答案讨论选项, 没有定论的.

其次, 如果有do, 很顺理成章的指代sell; 而selling于sell的对应肯定没有前者好, 为何要退而求其次呢?

作者: jerrold0023 时间: 2005-6-12 11:40

支持薰衣紫草！

改选项讨论精神可嘉，但毕竟没有人能完全明白ETS的标准。

弄出答案，搞懂问题就好了！

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)