ChaseDream

标题: LSAT 10_4-1 [打印本页]

作者: sammen    时间: 2005-6-8 21:08
标题: LSAT 10_4-1

1. People who accuse the postal service of incompetence and inefficiency while complaining of the proposed five-cent increase in postal rates do not know a bargain when they see one. Few experiences are more enjoyable than reading a personal letter from a friend. Viewed in this way, postal service is so underpriced that a five-cent increase is unworthy of serious debate.> >>>


The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument> >


(A) suggests that the postal service is both competent and efficient, but does not establish how competence and efficiency should be measured> >


(B) claims that the proposed increase is insignificant but does not say at what level the increase would be worthy of serious debate> >


(C) confuses the value of the object delivered with the value of delivering that object


(D) appeals to an outside authority for support of a premise that should be established by argument


(E) fails to establish whether or not the critics of the postal service are employees of the postal service


这个题目选C,我就没明白,谢谢NN给解释一下.


作者: mygoalusa    时间: 2005-6-9 09:54

Value of the object delivered refers the value of the letter, reflected as "Few experiences are more enjoyable than reading a personal letter from a friend."


But value of delivering that object refers to the postage it will cost to have the letter delivered, which is a completely different topic from the value of the letter/object.


作者: sammen    时间: 2005-6-9 19:49
谢谢,我明白.唉真是笨哦.




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3