标题: something confused [打印本页] 作者: nina23 时间: 2003-8-16 11:05 标题: something confused 7 Judge Lois Forer's study asks why do some litigants have a preferred status over others in the use of a public resource, the courts, which in theory are available to all but in fact are unequally distributed among rich and poor. (A) do some litigants have a preferred status over others in the use of a public resource, the courts, which in theory are available to all but in fact are unequally distributed among (B) some litigants have a preferred status over others in the use of a public resource, the courts, which in theory are available to all but in fact are unequally distributed between (C) do some litigants have a preferred status over another in the use of a public resource, the courts, in theory available to all but in fact are unequally distributed among (D) some litigants have a preferred status to another in the use of a public resource, the courts, in theory available to all but in fact not equally distributed between (E) does one litigant have a preferred status over the other in the use of a public resource, the courts, in theory available to all but in fact they are not equally distributed among
answer is E
In answer E,there is "have a preferred status over....", is that right??
I only know "prefer...to.." is right.Please give me advice.thank you.作者: 1stzhang 时间: 2003-8-16 12:01
答案你是不是搞错了？答案应该是B作者: nina23 时间: 2003-8-16 12:11
sorry,the answer is B
I think I type B,,But my fingers sometimes are naughty作者: mindfree 时间: 2003-8-17 22:09
If what you asked was whether "preferred" is correct here, I say it is. The -ed form of any vt. such as "prefer" can be as like adj. e.g. "a well-publicized campaign", "a polished story", etc.
If what you asked was whether "litigant have a preferred staus" is correct, yes it is. It means that each litigant has one status. For example, three of us have a car.作者: nina23 时间: 2003-8-19 07:31
THANK YOU，，，，ACTRUALLY，I DON‘T THINK THE USAGE OF OVER IS RIGHT。