`It makes no sense that in most places fifteen year olds are not eligible for their driver's license while people who are far older can retain all of their driving privileges by simply renewing their license. If older drivers can get these renewals, often without having to pass another driving test, then fifteen year olds should be eligible to get a license. Fifteen year olds typically have much better eyesight, especially at night; much better hand-eye coordination; and much quicker reflexes. They are also less likely to feel confused by unexpected developments or disoriented in unfamiliar surroundings, and they recover from injuries more quickly.~
1：这个题目怎么用七宗罪来定罪？如果是assume的话只有一个：假设除了文中给出的以外，老年人没有比年轻人强的地方
2：错误点不足
请牛牛指点，thx
`It makes no sense that in most places fifteen year olds are not eligible for their driver's license while people who are far older can retain all of their driving privileges by simply renewing their license. If older drivers can get these renewals, often without having to pass another driving test, then fifteen year olds should be eligible to get a license.
无因果关系
Fifteen year olds typically have much better eyesight, especially at night; much better hand-eye coordination; and much quicker reflexes.
no sufficient evidence
They are also less likely to feel confused by unexpected developments or disoriented in unfamiliar surroundings, and they recover from injuries more quickly.~
个人觉得这个逻辑上不大对吧？类似于小偷应该去抢有钱人因为他们相比穷人比较不会因为财产损失而难过什么的。
1：这个题目怎么用七宗罪来定罪？如果是assume的话只有一个：假设除了文中给出的以外，老年人没有比年轻人强的地方
2：错误点不足
请牛牛指点，thx
谢谢版版，
2 no sufficient evidence 我觉得原文没有问题啊，我怎么感觉这是一个常识啊
我现在倒觉得
They are also less likely to feel confused by unexpected developments or disoriented in unfamiliar surroundings
这句有问题
你说的and they recover from injuries more quickly.~
的问题我怎么没觉得呢
关于后来问的问题我是这么看的
2The purpose of the essay is for you to critique the reasoning of the argument. Your personal opinions are not relevant. While in the analysis of an issue you write your opinion on a subject, in the analysis of argument you write a logical critique of a flawed argument. 这是800score上面的一句话。因此常识，个人观点都可以不带到argument的写作里面。我们就是按照作者的逻辑去推他的结论找这里的错误。
3因为受伤之后康复比较快就可以让15岁的人开车了吗？我觉得这个不符合逻辑吧。那他们把别人撞的很严重怎么办？之所以不让他们开车是要防患于未然啊。不能亡羊补牢而要未雨绸缪。
谢谢斑斑，2我还是不赞同，我认为这种常识是没有争议的，因为一般情况下，少年却是比老人的视力，身手要灵活一些，当然不排除有反例。
第3点解释的太精彩了，
1.比视力和协调能力更重要的是经验和责任感。小孩就是缺这些
2.小孩不够成熟，冲动，不负责任不适合当驾驶员
3 have nothing to do 切断因果
谢谢版版，
2 no sufficient evidence 我觉得原文没有问题啊，我怎么感觉这是一个常识啊
我现在倒觉得
They are also less likely to feel confused by unexpected developments or disoriented in unfamiliar surroundings
这句有问题
你说的and they recover from injuries more quickly.~
的问题我怎么没觉得呢
呵呵，似乎不是年轻人和老年人的比较而是15岁的人和比他们大的人的比较。所以谁的视力更好，谁的身手更敏捷似乎不是一定的。
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |