第一篇AI002，是东拼西凑抄来的……大家猛烈拍砖啊，我里面很多表述都拿不准 - ChaseDream

2. “It is unrealistic to expect individual nations to make, independently, the sacrifices necessary to conserve energy. International leadership and worldwide cooperation are essential if we expect to protect the world’s energy resources for future generations.” Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above. Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.

Whether international leadership and worldwide cooperation should be instrumental in protecting world’s energy resources is a controversial issue that draws many attentions recent years. Proponent argues that one powerful nation should take the lead position and organize the worldwide conservancy, and the opponent claim that some individual nations need to make sacrifices necessary to conserve energy. I agree that in some cases one nation have to sacrifice on the world’s behalf, however, generally speaking, I believe effective leadership is crucial to the conservancy.

The primary reason for my view is that developing countries are home to scarce resources or important ecosystems, and these resources are decisive factors of their economic development. Therefore, it is really unrealistic for these countries to compromise too much on account of their extensive economic mode. Moreover, these countries are also poor and heavily polluted, thus it is a challenge to scientists and environment experts to create a conservancy system suitable for these countries. As mentioned above, it is impractical to expect resource-possessed counties to sacrifice and protect worldwide environment.

Another reason for my view is that leadership and cooperation always lead to efficiency and fairness, while anarchy generally causes turmoil and chaos. A case in point is OPEC, an organization of eleven developing counties heavily relied on oil revenues, successfully bring stability and harmony to the world oil market by adjusting oil-producing counties’ outputs. On the other hand, Indonesia organized a forest management system which intends to protect tropical forest. But the system ends in chaos because of inefficient management, which can be avoided if one center organization were in charge of the system.

Those who oppose the international alliance and collaboration may point out that superpowers, most of which are developed countries and consume large proportion of the word’s energy, will take manipulate the leadership and formulate policies in favor of themselves. Yet I admit the potentiality, I still believe collaboration is superior. Superpowers also care about the global ecosystem and resources because their final interests are disconnected with the global resources.

In conclusion, it appears that particular sacrifice of some nations is beneficial to the resource conservancy. However, as I have analyzed above, collaboration and alliance are much more reasonable. Therefore we can safely draw the conclusion that international leadership and worldwide cooperation are essential to protect the world’s resources for the future generations.

以下是引用小女公子在2005-6-1 13:16:00的发言：

Whether international leadership and worldwide cooperation should be instrumental in protecting world’s energy resources is a controversial issue that draws many attentions recent years.

recently

Proponent argues that one powerful nation should take the lead

leading我理解的international leadership 是联合国或者国际组织什么的，所以这个支持者意见我个人觉得不大对头

position and organize the worldwide conservancy, and the opponent claim that some individual nations need to make sacrifices necessary to conserve energy. I agree that in some cases one nation have to sacrifice on the world’s behalf, however, generally speaking, I believe effective leadership is crucial to the conservancy.

The primary reason for my view is that developing countries are home to scarce resources or important ecosystems, and these

很多发达国家也有很多稀有资源和独特的生态结构啊，象是米国加拿大澳大利亚什么的呵呵

resources are decisive factors of their economic development. Therefore, it is really unrealistic for these countries to compromise too much on account of their extensive economic mode. Moreover, these countries are also poor and heavily polluted, thus it is a challenge to scientists and environment experts to create a conservancy system suitable for these countries. As mentioned above, it is impractical to expect resource-possessed counties to sacrifice and protect worldwide environment.

沙特也是发展中国家吗？

successfully bring stability and harmony to the world oil market by adjusting oil-producing counties’ outputs. On the other hand, Indonesia organized a forest management system which intends to

这种语法错误要注意啊，时态不匹配

protect tropical forest. But the system ends in chaos because of inefficient management, which can be avoided if one center organization were in charge of the system.

Those who oppose the international alliance and collaboration may point out that superpowers, most of which are developed countries and consume large proportion of the word’s energy, will take

去掉

manipulate the leadership and formulate policies in favor of themselves. Yet I admit the potentiality, I still believe collaboration is superior. Superpowers also care about the global ecosystem and resources because their final interests are disconnected with the

connected吗？

global resources.

尖锐一点说有点小混乱。不过其实问题不大，解决方案就是理清思路再动手敲键盘，磨刀不误砍柴功。我的提纲如下仅供参考：

1.每一个国家都是把自己的利益放在第一位的.让一个国家为了全球的利益而自己做出牺牲是不可能的(在这个case里面是为了保存能源)我们都知道很多能源如果以现在的速度使用都会很快被耗竭.但是如果让某一个国家为了全球的能源保护而停止使用该能源就是不可能的.
2.一个国家的牺牲是否真的就能有效地保护能源也是有待商榷的.每个国家尽管人口有多有少经济有发达和不发达但是相比全世界200多个国家而言都只是一个组成部分,怎么可能指望一个国家的牺牲就可以保护全球的资源呢?事实上只有国际合作把各个国家组成一个有机的整体才能充分地有效率地做好保护的工作.有些河流的上游和下游分别在不同的国家。upper reaches lower reaches
3.诚然在这中间每个独自的国家一定会作出一定的牺牲但这和单独的牺牲是不一样的.这种牺牲是在一定的在一定的规则和国际协商的基础下的,是可以被一个国家在权衡了得失之后接受的.

（1）The development of every country is not the same. For some developing countries, developing economics is more important than conserving energy.

（2）International leadership and worldwide cooperation are needed to adjust the distinct measures of respective country in order to avoid waste of resources.

（3）Even though some country is so self-motivated that it makes the sacrifices necessary to conserve energy, the outcome will not be satisfying if other countries keep consuming energy without limit.