ChaseDream

标题: 请教OG268 [打印本页]

作者: Dinaxie    时间: 2005-5-30 16:59
标题: 请教OG268

Ranked as one of the most important of Europe’s young playwrights, Franz Xaver Kroetz has written forty plays; his works—translated into over thirty languages—are produced more often than any contemporary German dramatist.


(D) than those of any other



我认为这个地方比较的应该是are produced的程度,因为often修饰的是produce,答案应该是


than those of any other do



但解释上说: compare Kroetz’s works to any (other) contemporary German dramatist.


请各位大侠解释一下,谢谢
作者: ring_cheng    时间: 2005-5-30 21:02

请MM先在置顶的讨论贴/或用搜索功能找找,好东西很多哦!


【讨论连接】GMAT语法讨论汇总  


og268



http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardID=23&ID=26893


作者: Dinaxie    时间: 2005-5-31 16:52

首先谢谢ring_cheng的回应,我感觉在我们的“大家庭”里很温暖哦!(肉麻嘛!)


链接我看了,惊讶我们的版主做了这么多工作,感动ing.


可是我还是不太明白:


如果大家认同OG268是省略了do的化,那么就说明此处比较的不是works(可解释上是这么说的呀!)而是produce是吗?


再来一个:


Nowhere in Prakta is the influence of modern European architecture more apparent than their government buildings.


© more apparent than in its


这里对象比较的是不是influence ?如果是,为何不是:


more apparent than that in its


作者: ring_cheng    时间: 2005-5-31 18:00

我认为这个地方比较的应该是are produced的程度,因为often修饰的是produce,答案应该是


than those of any other do



补出的助动词是承前省略的一种形式,要能指代前面出现的谓语动词,这道题我认为:do无法指代前面出现的are produced,因此补出do是不正确的。即使补出are,在补不补之间不会影响句意,因此最好不补(简洁原则)。


刚好我回了一个关于补出的贴子,有兴趣的话MM可以参考下:


http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardid=23&id=56303&star=1#1089541


请继续讨论!


作者: ring_cheng    时间: 2005-5-31 18:03

再来一个:



Nowhere in Prakta is the influence of modern European architecture more apparent than their government buildings.



© more apparent than in its


这里对象比较的是不是influence ?如果是,为何不是:


more apparent than that in its



这题讨论贴里也有的。


我觉得这里的比较对象是两个介词短语:in Prakta 和in its government buildings。


整个句型是no more than 的倒装。


供参考!


作者: Dinaxie    时间: 2005-6-1 17:35
再次谢谢ring_cheng,请问我们如何判断比较句的比较对象?




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3