47. The following appeared as part of an article in the business section of a local newspaper.
“The owners of the Cumquat Café evidently made a good business decision in moving to a new location, as can be seen from the fact that the Café will soon celebrate its second anniversary there. Moreover, it appears that businesses are not likely to succeed at the old location: since the Café’s move, three different businesses — a tanning salon, an antique emporium, and a pet-grooming shop — have occupied its former spot.”
47. 地方报纸的商业版：
Cumquat咖啡店的拥有者最近做出了一个出色的商业决定：搬迁到新地址。从事实可见，咖啡店会很快在那里庆祝它的两周年店庆。而且这项业务看来在原址上不能获得成功。因为咖啡店搬迁后，3家不同的商家：一个日光浴沙龙，一个古董店，一个宠物婚嫁店就占据了它原来的地址。
augment里的reasoning都看不明白……
请赐教
1在新地址庆祝第二个周年纪念日只能说明，搬到新地址之后咖啡店继续存活了下来但是不是比原来好了作者并没有给出足够的证据证明。
2导致另外三家店无法在那个地点经营下去的原因可能并表示不是地址而是其他因素
3那个地址就算不适合开那三种店打算内并没有证据证明也不适合开咖啡店
改标题呀！这个是老题的47吧？呵呵蜘蛛侠犯这种错误可是不应该哦！
丢人现眼啊，呵呵，标题已改。
可是，我觉得文中没说三家新商店不能经营啊？？只说占了咖啡店的位置 …………不懂不懂…………
不是AI是AA呵呵
还要改
一个地点怎么可能同时开三家店呢？潜台词就是一个接一个的黄了呵呵。
天哪………… ets……
我现在真的觉得，无法读懂ets的很多潜台词……
1在新地址庆祝第二个周年纪念日只能说明，搬到新地址之后咖啡店继续存活了下来但是不是比原来好了作者并没有给出足够的证据证明。
2导致另外三家店无法在那个地点经营下去的原因可能并表示不是地址而是其他因素
3那个地址就算不适合开那三种店打算内并没有证据证明也不适合开咖啡店
1这一点应该定义为什么逻辑错误呢？我知道2是一个因果过于简单化的问题，3是一个FLASE ANALOGY
no sufficient evidence吧
个人觉得不一定每个都要明确指出逻辑错误的名称的呵呵。
这么多同志陪我熬夜哦呵呵
个人习性～～～俺比较死抠
我的考试题目呢……
“The owners of the Cumquat Café evidently made a good business decision in moving to a new location(时序性因果：就算是success，也不一定是搬迁造成的), as can be seen from the fact that the Café will soon celebrate its second anniversary there（充分必要性：凭什么说店庆就代表success）. Moreover, it appears that businesses are not likely to succeed at the old location: since the Café’s move, three different businesses — a tanning salon, an antique emporium, and a pet-grooming shop — have occupied its former spot.（错误类比：这三种新business可能面对强烈竞争。而cafe仅此一家，没有竞争。）”
不是AI是AA呵呵
还要改
一个地点怎么可能同时开三家店呢？潜台词就是一个接一个的黄了呵呵。
spot代表一个点是吗?
如果不是一个地“点”的话，it is possible that 一楼二楼三楼三家瓜分，或者大家挤一挤、凑合一下。
我当时看这个题的时候就是对：“三家店铺have occupied就是代表前两个都黄了”半信半疑。还有，有三家店占领过，哪因该是黄了两家啊，第三家还没黄哪！怎么范文里就说3家都完蛋了？
my view
1. one unwanranted assumption: the cafe can make success by moving to a new location? what if it keeps its poor service and delivery?
2. fallacy of casual reasoning: attributes its failure in the old place to location, based on the events of 3 unsuccessful companies in the same location. They may suffer from totally different reasons.Poor service, no enough customers....
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |