Reserach during the past everal decades on the naute of language and the processe that produce and make it understandable has revealed great complexit instead of underlying simplicity.
(A) that produce and make it understandable has revealed great complexity instead of underlying simplicity
(C) by which it is produced an understood has revealed not underlying simplicity but great complexity
我是新手,有点迷惑,请给点意见吧!
我选(C), 但是刘振民的答案是(A), 解释好像有问题。
原题中"the processes"指的是 produce 和 understand language (代词 it 所指代的对象)的过程。所以,应该采用被动语态表达 language 被 produced 和 understood 的过程。 所谓主动语态优于被动语态的XDF原则并不适用。
Reserach during the past everal decades on the naute of language and the processe that produce and make it understandable has revealed great complexit instead of underlying simplicity.
(A) that produce and make it understandable has revealed great complexity instead of underlying simplicity
(C) by which it is produced an understood has revealed not underlying simplicity but great complexity
我是新手,有点迷惑,请给点意见吧!
我选(C), 但是刘振民的答案是(A), 解释好像有问题。
原题中"the processes"指的是 produce 和 understand language (代词 it 所指代的对象)的过程。所以,应该采用被动语态表达 language 被 produced 和 understood 的过程。 所谓主动语态优于被动语态的XDF原则并不适用。
如果是C的话,那么不应该是has revealed not...but 而应该是hasn't revealed...but
如果是C的话,那么不应该是has revealed not...but 而应该是hasn't revealed...but
不应该这样讲.并非是hasn't,原文用法是对的.
EG.I have eat not apples but pears.
I have not eat apples but have had dinner.
its just a simple question, we dont have to think it too much to make it confusing ourself..haha
in 1 minute..u dont have much time to think to much rules.
I think for this question first-we will choose the answer from A or C
then use 主动优先的原则, some ppl dont want to use this rule, why not...
我也选C,按A的意思,是不是produce 和make并列,补全的话就是produce it understandable and make it understandable前者显然不对啊
请大家指点
我也认为C好些!逻辑意思的正确应该远优于主动优先的原则啊!! 大NN们怎么看?
我认为应该是 A.
我选的也是C。
大NN们,到底应该是逻辑意思优先还是“主动优先原则”,或者C有其他的语法错误
好老的帖子,还没有定论,汗!!
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |