ChaseDream

标题: 求问og13 41题～～请大家探讨一下 [打印本页]

作者: karenaxin 时间: 2015-7-23 13:45
标题: 求问og13 41题～～请大家探讨一下
41. In 1850, Lucretia Mott published her Discourse on Women, arguing in a treatise for women to have equal political and legal rights and for changes in the married women's property laws.
(A) arguing in a treatise for women to have equal political and legal rights
(B) arguing in a treatise for equal political and legal rights for women
(C) a treatise that advocates women's equal political and legal rights
(D) a treatise advocating women's equal political and legal rights
(E) a treatise that argued for equal political and legal rights for women

解析在此：

Mott’s Discourse was a treatise, and it is redundant and confusing to present her as both publishing her Discourse andarguing in a treatise, as though they were two separate things. The verb arguing must be followed by a prepositional phrase beginning with for, but the verb advocating simply takes a direct object.

A. After published her Discourse … arguing in a treatise is wordy and imprecise.

B. Arguing in a treatise is redundant and awkward.

C. The verb advocates does not work idiomatically with the prepositional phrase for changes. …

D .The verbal advocating does not work idiomatically with the prepositional phrase for changes. …

E. Correct. The title of Mott’s publication is followed by a phrase describing the treatise, and argued is followed byfor.

此题选e。。我选的是b，根据comma,+v-ing的原则，此处arguing modifies 前面的主句 , applies to Lucretia Mott，感觉没什么问题。

答案说b太wordy。。我想问如果去掉in a treatise，b选项变成arguing for equal political and legal rights for women可以选吗？

如果仅仅凭wordy这个理由把b排除，在考试这么紧张的时间状态下，真的很难看出来啊。。

再加上e选项用的是被动语态，感觉有点迷惑T T

再次先谢过大家！！！～

作者: zbyloveinter 时间: 2015-7-24 04:10
我只能从经验的角度说一下

GMAT有很多这样的题，
主句描述一种方法，a solution that.....
主句描述一个人写了一本书，a work that....
主句描述了气候异常，a phenomenon that....

至于为啥wordy，你想像一下老外说中文
老外自己觉得没什么，能懂
你也听得懂，但也知道一个中国人永远不会这么说话
这就是wordy and awkward

作者: karenaxin 时间: 2015-7-24 07:13

zbyloveinter 发表于 2015-7-24 04:10
我只能从经验的角度说一下

GMAT有很多这样的题，

谢谢这位大侠～～我想你说的有道理，之前看到有一个解释说，像是这样的句式，还是倾向于用同位语修饰，虽然总结得有点简单粗暴，但也提醒了我以后遇到这种句式要小心吧～

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)