救命啊！这种假设题太变态了！！！ - ChaseDream

就是：假设题选项里面有加强滴家伙，尤其是当这个加强是桥梁型加强时，取非肯定削弱，就他啦！Hiahia! 结果错了，再往后看，还有更好的not+weaken

大虾们这种题怎么做呀，万一ETS把那个桥梁型加强放在A，我觉得对，就不再往下看，岂不惨死？？？？

C. Bronchial inhalers are unsafe, even when used according to the recommended instructions.

D. The use of bronchial inhalers aggravates other diseases that frequently occur among asthma sufferers and that often lead to fatal outcomes even when the asthma itself does not.

E. Increased urban pollution, improved recording of asthma deaths, and the used of asthma deaths, and the use of bronchial inhalers are the only possible explanations of the increased death rate due to asthma.

思路：不是解释1和2，就是解释3。隐含了1，2，3外没用其他解释的理由。

E. 取非，除了1，2，3解释还有其他解释。典型的他因削弱，符合ETS 假设定义。

Despite improvements in treatment for asthma, the death rate from this disease has doubled during the past decade from its previous rate. Two possible explanations for this increase have been offered. First, the recording of deaths due to asthma has become more widespread and accurate in the past decade than it had been previously. Second, there has been an increase in urban pollution. However, since the rate of deaths due to asthma has increased dramatically even in cities with long-standing, comprehensive medical records and with little or no urban pollution, one must instead conclude that the cause of increased deaths is the use of bronchial inhalers by asthma sufferers to relieve their symptoms.

正常做题目，取非太慢了。一般先用第一种方法能解决80%以上的assumption题目

A原文的信息无法推出；B原文信息也没有，C也推不出，D更加推不出

E说只有几种解释，因为原文提出两种解释，之后都被否定，否定后又说唯一的可能是。。。，因此可以推出E

Advertisement: Clark brand-name parts are made for cars manufactured in this country. They satisfy all of our government automotive tests-the toughest such tests in the world. With foreign-made parts, you never know which might be reliable and which are cheap look-alikes that are poorly constructed and liable to cost you hundreds of dollars in repairs. Therefore, be smart and insist on brand-name parts by Clark for your car.

D. parts that satisfy or government standards are not as poorly constructed as cheap foreign made parts

E. if parts are made for cars manufactured in our country, they are not poorly constructed

C牌零件满足国家严格的汽车检测，而国外的不知道哪部分是可靠，哪部分是要花大量银子修理的，因此推出明知的选择是坚持使用C牌零件。

C就是太绝对了，取非的话是some foreign-made parts satisfy our government standards，明显不能削弱的吧

if parts are made for cars manufactured in our country,它又提了新的条件.

首先，大将军兄弟（或者姐妹），你的第一个ＬＳＡＴ的题中，我怎么就没有看出来Ｄ哪里在加强呢？？？？？？？

根据我的假设题的理解找漏洞是很重要的，漏洞一般出现在因果或条件句中，第一题中的ＳＩＮＣＥ　＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿　ＴＨＥＮ　＿＿＿＿＿＿＿也就是漏洞的地方了～！（为什么因为１，２不可能就是３呀？假设就是只有１，２，３，这３个原因）

假设题考点是这样的，Ａ－－－（ＧＡＰ）－－－－Ｂ．看见ＧＡＰ了吗？补上就行了．

加强题是　Ａ－－－－Ｂ成立（没有任何的ＧＡＰ可能题中已经补好了），答案就是再说一边怎么补的．就是加强了～！

关于你那个ＬＳＡＴ的第２个题，我想说Ｂ　与Ｄ　都谈不上加强．

本题的ＧＡＰ依然出在ＴＨＥＲＥＦＯＲＥ（因果关系那里）．之前说因为　１．Ｃ产品通过政府的各种验证　２．消费者没有辨别国外产品真假的能力．所以要买Ｃ产品．

问问自己，为什么满足以上２个原因就要买Ｃ产品呀？要是Ｃ象国外的劣等产品一样怎么办？假设就是Ｄ产品只要通过了政府的验证后都不象国外的劣等产品．有了这样的假设之后，即使没有辨别真伪的能力也没有关系了．所以原因１＋２＋假设足以让我们安全的推出坚持买Ｃ的结论．

其次，楼上解释得真好！境界实在是高，俺做题时就没有想那么多，因为基础不好，所以经常读不出GAP，因此就任ETS摆布啦

以下是引用GMATCRACKER1983在2005-5-19 1:30:00的发言：

假设是强调推倒的过程，加强是加强已经推出的结论．

没有成立的结论哪里来得加强呀？？？？？？

关于你那个ＬＳＡＴ的第２个题，我想说Ｂ　与Ｄ　都谈不上加强．

有了Ｄ之后，你再说Ｂ，Ｄ之类的是加强就不为过分了｀！

不知解释清楚没有～！

有个问题请教，They satisfy all of our government automotive tests-the toughest such tests in the world. 原文已经说了我们政府的标准是世界上最严格的此类标准，当然可以推出满足政府标准的parts不会像国外的劣等品一样呀！满足了最严格的标准，即使消费者没有辨别真假的能力，同样也可推出买C产品呀！（当然我这里又有一个假设：国外的劣等品不可能满足相关的严格标准）？也许是偶钻牛角了，leave open to discussion!