海蓝 发表于 2003-8-11 23:52
谢谢～～～～～明白了！！！看来白勇的讲解多多少少还是有些问题。今晚又发现了一句：Scientists have obse ...
不能以独立/同位语是修饰谓语来判断是独立主格，看下面的例子：
86. Having the right hand and arm being crippled by a sniper's bullet during the First World War, Horace Pippin, a Black American painter, worked by holding the brush in his right hand and guiding its movements with his left
(A) Having the right hand and arm being crippled by a sniper's bullet during the First World War
(B) In spite of his right hand and arm being crippled by a sniper's bullet during the First World War
(C) Because there had been a sniper's bullet during the First World War that crippled his right hand and arm
(D) The right hand and arm being crippled by a sniper's bullet during the First World War
(E) His right hand and arm crippled by a sniper's bullet during the First World War
In E, the best answer, the construction His right hand... crippled clearly and grammatically modifies the subject of the sentence, Horace Pippin. In A, the use of the two participles Having and being is ungrammatical. Choice B is awkward and changes the meaning of the original statement: the point is that Pippin's method of painting arose because of, not in spite of, his injury. Choice C is wordy and awkwardly places the clause beginning that crippled... so that it appears to modify the First World War rather than bullet. In choice D, The should be His, and being should be omitted.
独立主格也可以修饰名词。
***********引用*****************
No.1 Since 1981, the number of acres overseen by professional farm-management companies has grown from 48 million to 59 million, an acre about the size of Colorado.
OG上的题。白勇上课时说an acre...是n+n形式的独立主格，可an acre明明是解释59 million的，怎么会是修饰谓语呢？另外，即便是独主，也应该是n+prep形式的啊？～～疑惑中。
JERRY：此介宾结构偶认为是独立主格结构修饰59 million！此结构中的介宾修饰成分不可以略去不看，必须作为一个完整的相当于“主语+表语”结构来修饰前面的59 million。
No.2 Marcus Garvey advocated that some Blacks return to Africa, the land that symbolized the possibility of freedom.
JERRY：此先行词+定从结构是同位语。因为此结构的中心词是the land，修饰部分可以先略去不看，于是就可以变成Africa, the land. 名词修饰名词的同位语。
*******************************
可不可以这样理解呢？：
No.1 Since 1981, the number of acres overseen by professional farm-management companies has grown from 48 million to 59 million, an acre about the size of Colorado.
an acre 做前面 59 million的同位，补充修饰59million的。 而an acre about the size of Colorado又是个名词+介词的独立主格。an acre 既是前面的同位结构，而an acre about the size of Colorado又是个独立主格结构。
No.2 Marcus Garvey advocated that some Blacks return to Africa, the land that symbolized the possibility of freedom.
the land做前面Africa的同位。而that symbolized..从句是修饰the land.
我这样的理解对吗？
楼上的侠之大者juan, 我个人觉得：
No.1，an acre about the size of Colorado是名词+介词的独立主格；不能再说：an acre 是前面的同位结构。
No.2，我同意楼上的观点。
有请其他NN~~~
这一题中的第一题的讨论，至今未有定论，不知哪位高手总结一下。
资料：http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=23&ID=48096
所谓独立主格结构通俗的说是
两个句子中间没连词（有连词就是从句拉），句子主语又不一样（一样，其中一个句子可以改成分词了）
所以把其中一个句子的谓语变成分词形式
最简单的例子
It being sunday, I go out fo a picnic.(独立主格）
It is sunday and I go out for a picnic（用连词的）
这个句子不可能用分词结构的，因为第一个句子的逻辑主语是IT第二是I 不可能一致
原题的stunning是形容次表震惊的
海蓝 发表于 2003-8-11 23:52
谢谢～～～～～明白了！！！看来白勇的讲解多多少少还是有些问题。今晚又发现了一句：Scientists have obse ...
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |
