ChaseDream

标题: 求助一道LSAT题 [打印本页]

作者: 木川 时间: 2003-8-10 23:50
标题: 求助一道LSAT题
25. George: A well-known educator claims that children who are read to when they are very young are more likely to enjoy reading when they grow up than are children who were not read to. But this claim is clearly false. My cousin Emory was regularly read to as a child and as an adult he seldom reads for pleasure, whereas no one read to me and reading is now my favorite form of relaxation.

Ursula: You and Emory prove nothing in this case. Your experience is enough to refute the claim that all avid adult readers were read to as children, but what the educator said about reading to children is not that sort of claim.

Which one of the following describes a flaw in Georges reasoning?

(A) He treats his own experience and the experiences of other members of his own family as though they have more weight as evidence than do the experiences of other people.

(B) He does not distinguish between the quality and the quantity of the books that adults read to Emory when Emory was a child.

(C) He overlooks the well-known fact that not all reading is equally relaxing.

(D) He fails to establish that the claim made by this particular educator accurately reflects the position held by the majority of educators.

(E) He attempts to refute a general claim by reference to nonconforming cases, although the claim is consistent with the occurrence of such cases.

这道题答案为什么不是A，而是E？明明George举例的case和general claim是不一致的啊？

作者: sunder 时间: 2003-8-11 12:32
george的问题是他用自己的特例去反对general的论断（大多数情况下/对大多数人，正确的论断）。E指出了这个问题。
A说george觉得自己的例子的重要性比别人的例子高。george没有表示过类似的意思。

作者: 木川 时间: 2003-8-12 06:31
A的解释非常明白，谢谢。
烦请sunder再给看看，George举例的case和general claim是不一致，这个怎么解释呢？

作者: autumn_leaves 时间: 2005-2-6 23:14
标题: 求助一道LSAT题

鄙见:

GEORGE举的例子其实和专家的论断无关. 专家是说从小有人讲故事的人TEND TO ENJOY读书,而GEORGE讲他COUSIN不读书,但不读书不等于他不想读,可能因为工作太忙或其他原因.所以我觉得是NON-COMFORMING CASE

望指正.

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)