ChaseDream

标题: [求助]救命,issue不会写 [打印本页]

作者: ecoc    时间: 2005-4-27 09:26
标题: [求助]救命,issue不会写

argument没有问题,因为我喜欢在逻辑上给人挑刺,平时就喜欢。


可是issue,一般我是写个开头结尾,再把中间的几条论点写出来,可是就是干巴巴的一句,死活想不出写什么来填充内容。


要怎样练习阿,有没有有我这样的问题?



作者: judydongxueni    时间: 2005-4-27 10:19

楼主的问题我也有,呵呵所以不要太担心。你如果喜欢逻辑上给人挑刺。那写issue的时候就是反过来想不要让人家给自己挑刺。每一条论点写出来就拿理论论据和事实论据加以支持。理论论据估计你应该不成问题吧(逻辑很强?)事实论据恐怕要多积累。如果时间紧的话就找一些CD上现成的“万用”论据象是比尔盖茨的之类的就好了。还有置顶的范文也不错呀。


作者: ecoc    时间: 2005-4-27 10:47

关键是论据我觉得是非常明显的,好像没什么可解释的。

比如说今天作的题,“self-interest and fear are the essential motivation"

首先我admit self-interest under most of the circumstances is the deciding factor behind people's decisions. 这不是很明显的吗?然后能决什么例子,摆什么实事呢?这段怎么也要搞上一百字把。真是愁死我了。


作者: judydongxueni    时间: 2005-4-27 16:19

楼主的问题可能就是你的逻辑太好了。你觉得理所当然的事别人或者说E-RATER不一定也这么认为所以你就解释给他听:Infants will make no decisions with motivations other than their self-intrest. That is a demonstration of the human nature. In fact, we adults are the same. Although sometimes the motivations can seemingly be the public interest, responsiblity or something else, the hidden impetus is self interest. A director of a chemistry factory  may decide to install some devices to reduce the pollution. It seems that the decision is out of the concern with the public environment, but the truth  probably is that the factory director does not want to be punished by the strict environmental conservation law.

呵呵,这样你觉得可以解决你问题了吗?总之就是理所当然也要说,为了凑字数嘛!


作者: littlewoman    时间: 2005-5-1 05:59
judydongxueni好强啊




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3