ChaseDream

标题: og89 我的严重错误 [打印本页]

作者: junehi 时间: 2005-4-13 17:17
标题: og89 我的严重错误
A recent national study of the public schools shows that there are now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many than there were four years ago.

(A) there are now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many than there were

(B) there is now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many than there were

(D) every thirty-two pupils now have one microcomputer, four times as many than there were（C）

(E) every thirty-two pupils now has one microcomputer, four times as many as

第二遍看og，可是这题又错了，我的问题是一上来就把abc排除，原因都是there be 结构。类似的错误我经常犯，比如代词指代的问题。这种错误太严重了，它会让我一开始就把正确选项排除掉。

请问各位前辈有没有碰到这种问题，你们是怎么解决的？？

作者: 蓝夕叶子 时间: 2005-4-13 18:09

MM是不是用了XDF的方法，说凡是看到there be 结构都是错误的？

我想，解决的方法，还是看OG的解释，看它是怎么排除的。

例如这道题，我用as many as的固定搭配排除a，b，d，然后看平行并列排除e。

作者: ring_cheng 时间: 2005-4-13 19:09

记得以前CD上很多大牛都表示过：GMAT语法基本上没有所谓的定理，有的只是优先级而已。

我觉得：There be不是一定都错，相反像这种表示客观存在的事物是要用there be句型的。另外，表示“每。。。人就有一个。。”的固定用法是：one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils，类似的还有：One wolf for every 39 square miles

还有象叶子JJ的排除法也很好啊！学习！

作者: junehi 时间: 2005-4-13 23:36

谢谢叶子和ringcheng JJ, 我分析自己错误的原因还是知识点学习的不扎实.

当我碰到所谓的一些定理(类似there be一定错)涉及的题目时,就象找到救命稻草，忘了还有很多更客观的解题方法。

不说了，今天的任务还没完呢

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)