162. Concerned at the increase in accident fatalities,
(A) the parents of children under four years of age to be restrained in a child safety seat
(B) the restraint of parents of children under four years of age in a child safety seat
(C) that parents restrain children under four years of age in a child safety seat
(D) that children be restrained under four years of age in a child safety seat by their parents
(E) children to be restrained under four years of age by their parents in a child safety seat
我想请教
the parents of children under four years of age to be restrained in a child safety seat
这个under...从语法角度是就近修饰children呢还是可能修饰parents？
谢谢
但是好像A of B结构，是修饰A的吧？
今天第9次看这题时忽然觉得c有问题呀
C) that parents restrain children under four years of age in a child safety seat
in a child safety seat 是单数，前面的 children是复数
逻辑意义上不就成了 把所有四岁下的儿童限制在一张椅子上了？不通呀
我也在想，为什么用单数 a child safety seat?
应该是表示一类东西，是一种专门的可以在车上放小孩的座椅。试想改成child safety seats,好像意思比较模糊。
Choices D and E misplace the phrase under four years of age so the phrase dangles and seems to modify restrained rather than children.
OG说DE中的状语under 4 years of age有修饰歧异，但BCD中的in a child seat就不会有修饰age的歧异吗？
(B) the restraint of parents of children under four years of age in a child safety seat
(C) that parents restrain children under four years of age in a child safety seat
(D) that children be restrained under four years of age in a child safety seat by their parents
奇怪啊。我一开始以为介词短语做状语修饰离得最近的名词，但发现OG162没提 in a child seat的有可能是修饰age的歧异。然后我想也许是因为age包括在under 4 years of age这个状语里，所以两个状语并列共同修饰其前面的名词，
但是E中说E misplaces the phrase in a child safely seat to create the idea that the parents are in a child safety seat. 即parents包括在by their parents 这个状语里也有可能发生歧异。
再来一个例子163
Found throughout Central and South America, the sloth hangs from trees by its long rubbery limbs, sleeping fifteen hours a day and moving so infrequently that two species of algae grow on its coat and between its
toes.
OG解释说：The pronoun its shows clearly that the limbs belong to the sloth, not the trees.
trees 是在from trees这个状语中的，怎么就有trees by its long ...limbs的歧异（撇开its单复数问题不谈）。
Concerned at the increase in accident fatalities ---> modifies "
my question is: if this sentence is in present tense, can it change to
"Concerning at the...", Tennessee adopts...???
--thanks--
Confusing by the same question as above.
今天第9次看这题时忽然觉得c有问题呀
C) that parents restrain children under four years of age in a child safety seat
in a child safety seat 是单数，前面的 children是复数
逻辑意义上不就成了 把所有四岁下的儿童限制在一张椅子上了？不通呀
Concerned at the increase in accident fatalities ---> modifies "
my question is: if this sentence is in present tense, can it change to
"Concerning at the...", Tennessee adopts...???
--thanks--
根据朗漫得解释concern做动词是不能用被动得,所以这里应该是形容词concerned
修饰主语既然是形容词就是强调一种状态,而concerning是分词,强调动作.
分词修饰得用法如下
1.在句首表达得动作在主句谓语动词之前已完成,og44
2.如果是瞬间动词得分词形式,表示动作得多次性,比如knocking the door就是一直不停地敲门
3.如果是延续性动词则强调笼统的时间概念客观性
4.与形容词比更强调动作
所以我觉得这里不能改为concerning
concern2 W3 [transitive]
再次看到这题,似乎有了深入得体会
这题体现除了了gmat sc矮子里拔将军得原则,既然五个选项都有in a child safety seat就当是ets得疏忽,忍了,当没看见
但要是选项种有得选项是in children safety seats就得考虑进去了.
就像火山在信里爆发一样.你觉得自己理解没歧异,ets说逻辑有歧义,你觉得有歧义,ets又觉得没有
Concerned at the increase in accident fatalities,
Tennessee adopted a child-passenger protection law requiring the parents of children under four years of age to be restrained in a child safety seat.
(A) the parents of children under four years of age to be restrained in a child safety seat父母被限制,错
(B) the restraint of parents父母被限制,错of children under four years of age in a child safety seat
再次看到这题,似乎有了深入得体会
这题体现除了了gmat sc矮子里拔将军得原则,既然五个选项都有in a child safety seat就当是ets得疏忽,忍了,当没看见
但要是选项种有得选项是in children safety seats就得考虑进去了.
就像火山在信里爆发一样.你觉得自己理解没歧异,ets说逻辑有歧义,你觉得有歧义,ets又觉得没有
Concerned at the increase in accident fatalities,
Tennessee adopted a child-passenger protection law requiring the parents of children under four years of age to be restrained in a child safety seat.
(A) the parents of children under four years of age to be restrained in a child safety seat父母被限制,错
(B) the restraint of parents父母被限制,错of children under four years of age in a child safety seat
(C) that parents restrain children under four years of age in a child safety seat
(D) that children be restrained under four years of
age in a child safety seat by their parents (under four years of
age修饰restrained,意思好像说被限制在四岁以下)
(E) children to be restrained under four years of age
by their parents in a child safety seat (under four years of
age修饰restrained,意思好像说被限制在四岁以下)
(D) that children be restrained under four years of
age in a child safety seat by their parents (under four years of
age修饰restrained,意思好像说被限制在四岁以下)
(E) children to be restrained under four years of age
by their parents in a child safety seat (under four years of
age修饰restrained,意思好像说被限制在四岁以下)
难道不是限制在4岁以下的儿童？？？？？
难不成改成children under four years of age to be restrained？？？？
有什么区别吗？？？请NN指正！！！！！
(D) that children be restrained under four years of
age in a child safety seat by their parents (under four years of
age修饰restrained,意思好像说被限制在四岁以下)
(E) children to be restrained under four years of age
by their parents in a child safety seat (under four years of
age修饰restrained,意思好像说被限制在四岁以下)
难道不是限制在4岁以下的儿童？？？？？
难不成改成children under four years of age to be restrained？？？？
有什么区别吗？？？请NN指正！！！！！
不是NN,而且时隔一年....
我理解是D/E表达的是儿童被限制在四岁以下,而原文要求的意思是四岁以下的儿童被限制在安全座上.所以distort原义
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |