2. The average life expectancy for the
Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion drawn in the passage?
A. Insurance company statisticians do not believe that moving to
B. The governor of
C. The longevity ascribed to
D. Thirty percent of all Louisianans can expect to live longer than 77 years. C
E. Most of the
2.
C is the best answer. This choice suggests that a significant proportion of Hawaii’s population is genetically predisposed to be long lived. Since Louisianans are not necessarily so predisposed, and since the Louisianans’ children will acquire their genetic characteristics from their parents, not from their birthplace, this choice presents a reason to doubt that Hawaiian born children of native Louisianans will have an increased life expectancy. Therefore, this choice is the best answer.
Because the conclusion concerns people born in Hawaii, not the average Louisianan, A does not weaken the conclusion. Because the governor’s allegation is false, it cannot affect the conclusion. D fails to weaken the conclusion because it is consistent with the information given and the conclusion about life expectancy. By suggesting that Hawaii’s environment is in one respect particularly healthy, E supports the conclusion.
这题相信大家都做过, 但是感觉这个genetic出来的相当莫名其妙,虽然答案可以选出来,但是感觉GMAT还是要具有很多常识啊?!
可是有的题目又怕常识一用就错,到底怎么把握呢?还是这题有什么别的玄机?!
请教大家了!
谢谢!!
thanks Mindfree.
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |