ChaseDream

标题: 再问og 38 [打印本页]

作者: violetyang83    时间: 2005-4-1 17:56
标题: 再问og 38

38. Scientists have observed large concentrations of heavy-metal deposits in the upper twenty centimeters of Baltic Sea sediments, which are consistent with the growth of industrial activity there.


(A)          Baltic Sea sediments, which are consistent with the growth of industrial activity there


(B)          Baltic Sea sediments, where the growth of industrial activity is consistent with these findings


(C)          Baltic Sea sediments, findings consistent with its growth of industrial activity


(D)          sediments from the Baltic Sea, findings consistent with the growth of industrial activity in the area


(E)           sediments from the Baltic Sea, consistent with the growth of industrial activity there


All of the choices but D contain ambiguities. In A and B the words which and where appear to refer to sediments, and in E it is not clear what consistent describes. In A, C, and E, there is no logical place to which there or its could refer. In D, the best choice, the phrase sediments from the Baltic Sea tells where the sediments originate, findings provides a noun for consistent to modify, and in the area clearly identifies where the industrial activity is growing.




这里面D选项中的findings是指代的前面的sediments吗?请NN翻译下这句话啊。真是糊涂了


作者: likui    时间: 2005-4-1 19:14

句意:

科学家们已经观察到大量重金属堆积物于波罗的海上层20厘米处,这个发现与这个地区的工业活动情况相吻合。

finding

[countable]
1
[usually plural] the information that someone has discovered as a result of their study, work etc
Surveys conducted in other countries reported similar findings.

句中指的是Scientists have observed large concentrations of heavy-metal deposits in the upper twenty centimeters of Baltic Sea sediments,这样一个情况。

主要考察的是which或者it指代句子的错误用法;要用新名词或者Ving来替代。


作者: violetyang83    时间: 2005-4-1 20:51

I got it.


作者: peajack    时间: 2005-5-19 17:35
findings指concentrations of。。。。
作者: zhaozilong    时间: 2005-10-2 08:52

38. Scientists have observed large concentrations of heavy-metal deposits in the upper twenty centimeters of Baltic Sea sediments, which are consistent with the growth of industrial activity there.



(A)          Baltic Sea sediments, which are consistent with the growth of industrial activity there


(B)          Baltic Sea sediments, where the growth of industrial activity is consistent with these findings



(C)          Baltic Sea sediments, findings consistent with its growth of industrial activity



(D)          sediments from the Baltic Sea, findings consistent with the growth of industrial activity in the area



(E)           sediments from the Baltic Sea, consistent with the growth of industrial activity there

我觉得A挺对,当然D更正式。


都说要用FINDING代替WHICH ARE,但我看WHICH在这里指代SEDIMENTS也说的通阿。我看以前的解释都说这样的话逻辑不通。 沉淀物与工业活动增长相一致有何不妥?非要用finding表示不可?


我的想法可能可笑,但的确是我的思路,请指教,谢谢!


作者: zhaozilong    时间: 2005-10-3 03:57
up!
作者: zhaozilong    时间: 2005-10-3 12:32
up!!
作者: zhaozilong    时间: 2005-10-4 01:55

anyone here can help out?


作者: hl2006    时间: 2005-10-4 02:09
A: first, growth of industry activity--abstract noun, sediments--concrete noun, saying these two are consisient is a bit farfetching, secondly, "there" have no reference
作者: zhaozilong    时间: 2005-10-4 07:38

Hi hl2006, thanks for your reply.


first, growth of industry activity--abstract noun, sediments--concrete noun, saying these two are consisient is a bit farfetching. I fully agree this point.


secondly, "there" have no reference. Does 'there' need any clear reference, it obviously


refers to the upper twenty centimeters of Baltic Sea.


to be discussed...


作者: zhaozilong    时间: 2005-10-4 11:01

There is actually only one name of the area in this sentance, do we have to worry the word 'there' to which it refers to?


Any advice,or comment?


作者: zhaozilong    时间: 2005-10-5 00:36

There is actually only one name of the area in this sentance, do we have to worry the word 'there' to which it refers?


any advice, please!


作者: zhaozilong    时间: 2005-10-5 12:41

up!



作者: zhaozilong    时间: 2005-10-6 07:33

up!!



作者: joanrain    时间: 2005-10-6 11:43

我认为


1.sediments from ××sea比××sea sediments更好,因为前面说了是上面多少层的,依稀在哪里见过解释


2.当然是findings才能和growth相consistent,单纯的sediments是不行的,想当然是不科学的


3.c答案用绿色的字标出不明白为什么,里面的its指代不清,个人意见


赫赫


作者: zhaozilong    时间: 2005-10-14 14:10
Thank you, joan. very good point!
作者: dormousedzc    时间: 2007-12-2 00:00

有个问题还是非常地confused:  

findings consistent with...到底是同位语,还是独立主格结构???

我个人偏向于认为是同位语,相当于findings (that are) consistent with...

OG Verbal Review上说findings refers back to
            the scientists' observations. 貌似也是在暗示这是同位语从句.现在的关键就是搞清楚同位语是否能指代一句话,之前看到的例子都是有明显指代物的. 

例:OG11-72,110,114    VerbalReview-16,77

NNs,help!


作者: szy733    时间: 2008-1-16 12:50
我也不太明白




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3