ChaseDream

标题: og 33 题目中的 bug [打印本页]

作者: 薰衣紫草    时间: 2005-3-29 09:28
标题: og 33 题目中的 bug

33. From the earliest days of the tribe, kinship determined the way in which


the Ojibwa society organized its labor, provided access to its resources,


and defined rights and obligations involved in the distribution and


consumption of those resources.



(A)  and defined rights and obligations involved in the distribution and consumption of those resources



(B)  defining rights and obligations involved in their distribution and consumption



(C)  and defined rights and obligations as they were involved in its distribution and consumption



(D)  whose rights and obligations were defined in their distribution and consumption



(E)   the distribution and consumption of them defined by rights and obligations





这个bug 无关解题,只是看了几遍方才发现, 不知有无其他人看到.


划线应该把 defined前的 and 包括进去是吧?


作者: fr6102790    时间: 2005-3-29 15:34
4242
作者: peajack    时间: 2005-5-19 12:07
看的好用心
作者: gjgjie    时间: 2005-5-20 11:29
能解释一下吗?为什么画线的部分要包括and???
作者: 薰衣紫草    时间: 2005-5-21 05:26

不用管了. 无伤大雅之错.

别浪费宝贵的时间.


作者: welkin    时间: 2005-6-29 12:16

版主MM,and有没有画线差别大了,难怪我对OG解释“Furthermore, it is unclear what defining... consumption in B is intended to modify” 看不懂,正准备发贴问。如果and没有画线,那organized,provided,and defining 这三个词明显平行,至于修饰方式是否正确我不知道,但至少修饰对象是明确的。 但如果and有画线,那B就是结构就是...,doing...可做定语,可做状语,那才能谈得到OG解释中的修饰不明。我是怎么理解的,请版主指正。


顺便问问, N done..., done..., and doing... 这种修饰方法正确吗? 过去分词能和现在分词并列吗?


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-6-29 12:21:35编辑过]

作者: 薰衣紫草    时间: 2005-6-29 13:26

过去分词当然可以和现在分词并列OG210


另外: 过去时与现在完成时的并列, 现在完成时与一般现在时的并列, 在OG里也都是出现过的.


作者: welkin    时间: 2005-6-29 15:19

版主MM说的对,210我就错了,指看了形式,没有看逻辑意思。帮大家把OG210贴出来:


210. Scientists have recently discovered what could be the largest and oldest living organism on Earth, a giant fungus that is an interwoven filigree of mushrooms and rootlike tentacles spawned by a single fertilized spore some 10,000 years ago and extending for more than 30 acres in the soil of a Michigan forest.


(A) extending


(B) extends


(C) extended


(D) it extendedA
(E) is extending


Choice A, the best answer, preserves grammatical parallelism while allowing for logical expression of temporal relationships; A employs the parallel participial phrases spawned... and extending... to modify filigree. Other choices present different grammatical constructions that are not participial modifiers and thus not parallel to spawned: extends in B is a present-tense verb; it extended in D begins a new clause; and is extending in E ungrammatically introduces a new predicate. In C, extended is nonparallel if it is assumed to be a past tense verb form; if it is assumed to be a past participle, it illogically states, as does D, that the filigree extended only in the past.


作者: dengpeiqi    时间: 2005-8-20 14:53
请问those指代什么?
作者: goodwish    时间: 2005-10-29 09:07


请问those指代什么?


resources


作者: 当当84    时间: 2006-6-13 14:04
以下是引用welkin在2005-6-29 12:16:00的发言:

版主MM,and有没有画线差别大了,难怪我对OG解释“Furthermore, it is unclear what defining... consumption in B is intended to modify” 看不懂,正准备发贴问。如果and没有画线,那organized,provided,and defining 这三个词明显平行,至于修饰方式是否正确我不知道,但至少修饰对象是明确的。 但如果and有画线,那B就是结构就是...,doing...可做定语,可做状语,那才能谈得到OG解释中的修饰不明。我是怎么理解的,请版主指正。

这里解释说的是it is unclear what defining ...consumption in B is intended to modify。是因为defining 可以修饰主语the Ojibwa society ,也可以作为伴随修饰provided吗?对于分词修饰还是有点模糊

作者: 当当84    时间: 2006-7-4 20:38

对b的解释不是很理解

furthermore, it is unclear what defining consumption in B is intended to modify

这里是说, defining既可以修饰organized 也可以修饰provided?


作者: 当当84    时间: 2006-7-5 18:17

作者: amy7777    时间: 2006-9-22 10:24
以下是引用goodwish在2005-10-29 9:07:00的发言:


            
请问those指代什么?

resources

如果those 指代有是resources,那么后面又出现了resources,不是重复了吗???

 


作者: 混混狗    时间: 2006-9-22 10:32
以下是引用amy7777在2006-9-22 10:24:00的发言:

如果those 指代有是resources,那么后面又出现了resources,不是重复了吗???

 

"those" can be a adj.....
作者: amy7777    时间: 2006-9-22 10:40

电脑刚重启上来就看到答案了,真高兴,谢谢混混狗。

帮我看看我其它的贴子好吗。谢谢。


作者: amy7777    时间: 2006-9-22 19:59
我顶顶顶。呵呵。
作者: cherry123    时间: 2007-1-26 22:27
对E的解释不理解,

“and E presents rights and obligations as defining, rather than as being defined.”

E中哪里有defining啊?


作者: stgirl    时间: 2007-1-30 07:24

在刘振民语法里,他认为用use sth. to do sth. 即可解题。


作者: jianlysmile    时间: 2007-5-10 11:13
以下是引用cherry123在2007-1-26 22:27:00的发言:
对E的解释不理解,

“and E presents rights and obligations as defining, rather than as being defined.”

E中哪里有defining啊?

感觉这里说的是从句意上说

rights and obligations应该作为define的宾语被involved in the distribution and consumption of those resources 来修饰,而不是想E选项中的去修饰the distribution and consumption

E与原意不符合


作者: rxh28    时间: 2007-9-13 01:56

E"the distribution and consumption of them defined by rights and obligations"

I want to know what dose "them " infer.sorry I can't put in chinese.


作者: chamumu    时间: 2008-3-7 15:17

the Ojibwa society organized its labor, provided access to its resources, and defined rights and obligations involved in the distribution and consumption of those resources.


(A) and defined rights and obligations involved in the distribution and consumption of those resources

(B) defining rights and obligations involved in their distribution and consumption

(C) and defined rights and obligations as they were involved in its distribution and consumption

(D) whose rights and obligations were defined in their distribution and
     consumption

(E) the distribution and consumption of them defined by rights and obligations

OG 说 C中 its has no logical reference.  但是我想请问下BDE中的 their是不是也有指代的歧义呢?

原意是指代resources 但这里好像也可以理解成指代rights and obligations呢。。。。。。。。。


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-3-7 15:18:00编辑过]

作者: szy733    时间: 2008-3-18 11:17
ok
作者: piaolf123    时间: 2008-11-22 11:43
以下是引用chamumu在2008-3-7 15:17:00的发言:

the Ojibwa society organized its labor, provided access to its resources, and defined rights and obligations involved in the distribution and consumption of those resources.


(A) and defined rights and obligations involved in the distribution and consumption of those resources

(B) defining rights and obligations involved in their distribution and consumption

(C) and defined rights and obligations as they were involved in its distribution and consumption

(D) whose rights and obligations were defined in their distribution and
     consumption

(E) the distribution and consumption of them defined by rights and obligations

OG 说 C中 its has no logical reference.  但是我想请问下BDE中的 their是不是也有指代的歧义呢?

原意是指代resources 但这里好像也可以理解成指代rights and obligations呢。。。。。。。。。


C是因为its没有逻辑上的指代对象,它最多可以指代society,但是意思是不对的,所以说没有逻辑上的指代对象

BDE中的 their在意思上根本不能指代rights and obligations,是指代resoure的,所以不存在指代歧义。

C的问题是没有逻辑上的指代对,而BDE就算有问题的话也是指代歧义,根本是两种问题。






欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3