OG19. In addition to having more protein than wheat does, the protein in rice is higher quality than that in wheat, with more of the amino acids essential to the human diet.
(A) the protein in rice is higher quality than that in
(B) rice has protein of higher quality than that in
(C) the protein in rice is higher in quality than it is in
(D) rice protein is higher in quality than it is in（B）
(E) rice has a protein higher in quality than
每次看OG都会发现许多新的问题. 自以为这题熟悉的连答案都背下来了. 可是又发现新的困惑.
首先我知道正确答案为何正确以及其他答案为何错, 我不理解的是OG对于CD的一句解释:
In this sentence, the initial clause modifies the nearest noun, identifying it as the thing being compared with wheat. By making protein the noun modified, choices A, C, and D illogically compare wheat with protein and claim that the protein in rice has more protein than wheat does. In C and D, the comparative structure higher in quality than it is in wheat absurdly suggests that rice protein contains wheat. B, the best choice, logically compares wheat to rice by placing the noun rice immediately after the initial clause. B also uses that to refer to protein in making the comparison between the proteins of rice and wheat. Choice E needs either that in or does after wheat to make a complete and logical comparison.
可是我读了又读CD, 还是觉得是wheat contains protein, 而不是protein contains wheat.
个人认为in addition to其实也是一个并列结构,
所以 后面一句句子的主语要能用的上having这个动词
因此 只可以是rice
B/D选B 还是蛮容易判断的吧
我都知道.
麻烦大侠看一下我的提问好吗? 谢了!
看D：rice protein is higher in quality than it is in wheat
正确的比较应该是 rice protein is higher in quality than wheat protain。
那么认为it 应该指代wheat protain，然而错就错在这里，it只能指代出现过的名词，即rice protein。所以就变成了rice protein is in wheat了。
至于，谁包含谁的问题，好像没什么讲究吧！
MM真仔细啊！
看D：rice protein is higher in quality than it is in wheat
正确的比较应该是 rice protein is higher in quality than wheat protain。
那么认为it 应该指代wheat protain，然而错就错在这里，it只能指代出现过的名词，即rice protein。所以就变成了rice protein is in wheat了。
Bingo!!!
所以你也赞同rice protein is in wheat! 那也就是说wheat contains rice protein, 而不是OG所说的rice protein contains wheat!
contain应该是包含的意思吧. 是我复习着了魔头昏了.....还是ETS错了?
谈谈我的看法：
C/D项的意思：rice protein 在质量方面（in quality）比其在wheat方面（ in wheat）更高。
所以ETS说C/D项荒谬的认为rice protein 包含了wheat。
the protein in rice is higher in quality than it is in wheat
这句话翻译成中文就是: rice里的protein也在wheat里, (即 wheat contains rice protein). 并且质量要更好.
我认为 it 在这里指代的是 the protein in rice, 所以 ETS 对这句话的解释反了. ETS : rice protein contains wheat. 当然, 这并不影响解这道题. 本着精益求精的态度, 我还是想弄明白是我错了还是ETS错了.
我觉得MM有点只源身在此山中的意思（嘿嘿，俺也经常这样），但如果把此题放段时日再看，能否接受这样的解法：
the protein in rice 在质量方面比the protein in rice在WHEAT方面更高一些。
我认为 it 在这里指代的是 the protein in rice,
俺也认同你关于IT的指代
the protein in rice 在质量方面比the protein in rice在WHEAT方面更高一些。
即the protein in rice有质量及WHEAT这些特质，则说明the protein in rice 蕴涵质量和WHEAT这两样东东。
BTW，虽然本人发现了点ETS在CR上的错误，还真没发现ETS在RC上有错误，嘿嘿，毕竟是人家制定规则嘛。
即the protein in rice有质量及WHEAT这些特质，则说明the protein in rice 蕴涵质量和WHEAT这两样东东。
BTW，虽然本人发现了点ETS在CR上的错误，还真没发现ETS在RC上有错误，嘿嘿，毕竟是人家制定规则嘛。
多谢楼上一语点醒梦中人.
但ETS是否在SC中有破绽, 请看以下两个贴子.
http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardid=23&star=2&replyid=588636&id=5332&skin=0&page=2
http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=23&ID=101816
我也赞同版主的见解
我认为 it 在这里指代的是 the protein in rice
hi,MM
D: rice protein in wheat 的意思是rice protein 在 in wheat 方面, in wheat只是rice protein的一个性质, 就象 rice protein in quality=rice protein 在 质量方面. 所以ETS说好象rice protein contains wheat.
明白了么?
hi,MM
D: rice protein in wheat 的意思是rice protein 在 in wheat 方面, in wheat只是rice protein的一个性质, 就象 rice protein in quality=rice protein 在 质量方面. 所以ETS说好象rice protein contains wheat.
明白了么?
那如果就因为in wheat和in quality比较，就能说rice protein contains wheat,是不是也可以说rice protein contains quality?
既然wheat 和 quality 都是性质，那性质可以用contain吗？
那如果就因为in wheat和in quality比较，就能说rice protein contains wheat,是不是也可以说rice protein contains quality?
既然wheat 和 quality 都是性质，那性质可以用contain吗？
这是一个大哉问… 可不可以contain quality?
我看了前人的帖, 大多都是说 ETS说错了,应是wheat contains rice protein
但看看这个帖中的讨论是说 in quality 和 in wheat错误比较
也就是说 rice protein is higher in quality [在质量方面] than rice protein(it) is (high) in wheat [在麦方面].
所以, Rice protein contains quality 和 Rice protein contains wheat.
我想如果用英文逻辑思考, 这两种说法都是一样荒谬….
所以, 我认为ETS这边只是要指出 in quality 和 in wheat错误比较, 造成句意的错误
应该是不会有contain quality这种表达方式
quality当名词,依Cambridge字典查来的习惯表达是 …of high/low quality. The quality of..或top-quality(复合名词)等用法
但是会有 A contains quality B 的这种表达, 也就是说quality当adjective的角色
我稍微用Google查了一个句子:
Whatever the level of processing, consumers also want products with flavour that
contain quality and nutritious ingredients.
这里应该是表达quality (ingredients) 和 nutritious ingredients…”有品质”的原料
还有是 The website contains lot of quality content…等等 “有品质”的内容
这样看来, 在quality有修饰的对象前提下, 以句意而言 (不管文法和习惯表达的话), quality还是可以被contain
但我想这个了解细节, 真的是有点见树不见林了…重点还是:比较对象的清楚性和合理性
以上是个人意见 还请指正…
quality (STANDARD)
noun
1 [C or U] how good or bad something is:
a shop advertising top quality electrical goods
The food was of such poor/low quality.
Their products are of very high quality.
I only buy good-quality wine.
The quality of the picture on our television isn't very good.
2 a high standard:
He's not interested in quality. All he cares about is making money.
quality
adjective [before noun]
of a high standard:
This is a quality product.
MAINLY
我说一下自己的拙见，和解题时的思路，因为我也不太懂og的解释，
既然it= the protein in rice
那么这句话就可以是：
the protein in rice is higher in quality than the protein in rice is in wheat.
后面那句不用翻译也知道是错的....有点囫囵吞枣，请nn们帮忙改正.....
ets是想说，米蛋白在质量方面要比米蛋白在wheat方面要高，其实如果看不懂句子作首字母提炼最好。
protein in rice id higher in Q than it is in W.
其实是想说质量Ｑ是米蛋白的一个属性，Ｗ也看作一个属性（譬如维生素含量W）,谁叫他们在in结构上平行呢！
还是翻译存在误区，in不仅是“在什么里面”，还有“在什么方面”的意思。所以一直有人困惑。
每次看LZ的贴都有新收获......
呵呵，楼上众位的讨论就是我在脑袋里几种思考的冲突，最终不知道哪个对
不过，现在看来，其实也没法说哪个说的绝对正确，因为这道题的对于这一点的解释仅仅限于一句话，并且最后还带了个抽象词CONTAIN
但是，起码通过以上的讨论我们更加彻底的了解了THAN这个对比的前后平行关系了～～～～～
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |