0g-65

wpeng82

og的no。65题：
65. Correctly measuring the productivity of service workers is complex. Consider, for example,postal workers: they are often said to be more productive if more letters are delivered perpostal worker. But is this really true? what if more letters are lost or delayed per worker at the same time that more are delivered?
The objection implied above to the productivity measure described is based on doubts about the truth of which of the following statements?这个问题如何翻译啊？偶总是翻不好  望牛人指教！！！

心静

对“效率评定标准”持反对意见的人将其观点建立在对下面哪个理论（即选项）“真实性”的怀疑上？

siebel

鸥来诠释一下心静mm的话：

上文中，隐含的对p.m的异议，是建立在对如下哪个陈述的怀疑的基础之上？

wpeng82

我觉得心静mm说的好有理

dsyyxy2005

What if more letters are lost or delayed per worker at the same time that more are delivered?

各位老大, 这话咋翻译呀,晕

hawkinsxie

字面上：那么如果在每个邮递员投递更多的信的同时，有更多的信遗失或延误，怎么办？

可理解为：错误率 = lost+delayed / delivered，分子分母同时增加，即错误率不变。意即不应该根据delivered的数量来判断效率，而应该考虑错误率的大小。

zenithy

接着请教：

What if more letters are lost or delayed per worker at the same time that more are delivered?

上句中 that more are delivered是同位语从句？还是？

dovecat

我觉得像定语从句的感觉啊。同位语从句。。。。。。，不知道了。有点昏。

julia_ggw

我觉得是定语从句，that后面的从句修饰the same time，more后面省略了letters，补全后就是

What if more letters are lost or delayed per worker at the same time that more (letters) are delivered?

即：在大量的信被递送的同时有大量的信丢失了或延迟了又怎么样呢？

goodwaiter

以下是引用zenithy在2005-3-26 20:15:00的发言：

接着请教：

What if more letters are lost or delayed per worker at the same time that more are delivered?

上句中 that more are delivered是同位语从句？还是？

  这个合起来理解比较容易，　是个时间终于从句＝when more are delivered