- UID
- 930550
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2013-8-30
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
沙发
楼主 |
发表于 2014-12-18 21:14:16
|
只看该作者
Part II: Speed
Why employees earn more at big-box chains than mom-and-pop shops
by SIMONE PATHE | 12 Dec 2014
[Time 2]
Contrary to widespread belief, big-box stores and chains have increased wages in the retail sector as they have spread, according to “Do Large Modern Retailers Pay Premium Wages?” (NBER Working Paper No. 20313). Retail wages rise markedly with the size of the chain and the individual store, according to the study by Brianna Cardiff-Hicks, Francine Lafontaine and Kathryn Shaw. As retail chains’ share of establishments has risen from one-fifth in 1963 to more than one-third by 2000, the number of jobs that pay better than traditional mom-and-pop stores has proliferated.
Half of the difference in wages between large and small retailers appears to be attributable to differences in the average skill level of workers in the two groups of firms. On average, better workers find their way to the bigger companies. With more levels of hierarchy than small stores, larger establishments also allow better workers to move into management positions, increasing their pay even more.
“The increasing firm size and establishment size that are a hallmark of modern retail are accompanied by increasing wages and opportunities for promotion for many workers,” the authors write. “While retail pay is considerably below that in manufacturing, pay in retail is above that found in service jobs… [These results] contradict the image of the retail sector as one comprised of the lowest paying jobs in the economy.”
High-school graduates who work in retail firms with 1,000 or more employees earn 15 percent more on average than those who work in shops with fewer than 10 workers. The differential for those with some college education or a college degree is even more marked: pay is 25 percent higher in the larger firms. The study relied on Current Population Survey data to carry out these comparisons.
Using National Longitudinal Survey of Youth data, the authors find that the same holds true for the size of the individual store: the high-school educated earn 26 percent more at stores with 500 or more workers than at ones with fewer than 10; the college-educated earn 36 percent more.
[340 words]
[Time 3]
The pay disparities are much less dramatic when the authors control for worker quality. After this correction, they find the large-firm premium is 8 percent for high-school graduates and 11 percent for those with at least some college; the large-store premia are 19 percent and 28 percent, respectively.
The authors conclude that these “results imply that higher-quality workers are sorted into large firms and large establishments, but that working in larger firms or establishments yields additional increases in pay.”
These higher-quality workers are also often rewarded with promotions that boost their pay. The study finds that compared across different ability levels, managers make more than 23 percent more than non-managers if they have a high-school education; 20 percent more if they have at least some college.
The finding is important because the frequency of promotion to managerial positions, including first-line supervisors, is high in retail. According to data published by Glassdoor, an entry-level cashier in a Wal-Mart store earns an average $8.48 per hour, but a supervisor earns $14.38 per hour. A salaried shift manager makes $62,837 a year and a store manager earns $92,462. High-end grocery and big-box stores, such as Whole Foods and Costco, tend to pay more than other retailers. Manager pay varies substantially in the retail sector: 13 percent of managers earn $20,000 or less, but 33 percent earn more than $50,000.
Wages in the retail sector fall between those in other sectors. According to Current Population Survey data, the average hourly wage in retail is 68 percent of that in manufacturing. On the other hand, retail pays about 15 percent better than service occupations. The average hourly wage for men in non-managerial positions in retail is $16.28, versus $13.97 in services. For women, this disparity is $12.79 versus $11.15.
“The retail sector pays considerably less than manufacturing, but as the manufacturing sector has declined over time, the growth of modern retail chains has increased retail wages and provided more promotion opportunities, particularly for the more-able worker,” the authors conclude.
[335 words]
Source: Public Broadcasting Service
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/making-sense/why-employees-earn-more-at-big-box-chains-than-mom-and-pop-shops/
Work-life balance key to being the best
by Brian Amble | 19 Jan 2007
[Time 4]
Organisations in the U.S. that want to be seen as "employers of choice" attracting the brightest and best need to be far more flexible, supportive of employees' lives outside the office and just more fun than the non-stop treadmills that many were a decade ago.
Just how far the best American employers have come in acknowledging the importance of work-life balance is clear from Fortune magazine's annual "100 Best Companies to Work For" list, from which Google emerged in top spot.
The list, compiled by research Great Place to Work Institute, found that other factors commonplace among the best companies include increased racial and gender diversity, improved internal communications and increased use of employee stock ownership programs.
"While many commentators long for the workplace of old - with fully paid health care, generous pensions and lifetime job security - we see that for many lucky employees, the workplace has never been better," said Robert Levering, co-founder of Great Place to Work Institute and co-author of Fortune's list with Milton Moskowitz.
But the biggest changes over the last decade have come in employers' attitudes towards work, family and flexibility.
For example, 72 of the top 100 employers now offer job sharing programs, compared with only 18 a decade ago. Similarly, 79 offer compressed work weeks on a year-round, regular basis, compared with 25 companies in 1998.
Technology has also had a major impact, with 82 employers embracing remote working or telecommuting today, compared with only 18 in 1998.
Cisco has the highest proportion of telecommuters, with nine out of 10 employees telecommuting or working from home at some time or other. Five other companies on the 2007 list have half or more of their workforce working remotely compared with only one 10 years ago.
[293 words]
[Time 5]
One of the least-common benefits in corporate America a decade ago was the inclusion of domestic partners and same-sex couples in benefit plan coverage. Even then, 28 of the best companies offered domestic partner insurance. Today 70 do.
These improvements also are reflected in the fact that eight out of 10 employees at Fortune's "100 Best Companies to Work For" now feel that management encourages them to balance their work lives and their personal lives — an increase of 11 percentage points from 10 years ago. A similar proportion also think their employers offer special and unique benefits today — an increase of six percentage points.
Other notable increases include an eight-point increase in employees' perceptions of management's competence and a 15-point increase in employees' perceptions of opportunities to receive special recognition.
"These improvements are a direct result of global competition," Robert Levering said. "More companies now realize that they cannot compete successfully unless they attract and hold onto the most qualified workers.
"Today's employees simply won't put up with a lousy workplace environment. And women workers, in particular, are demanding a more family-friendly milieu. So, we expect that the workplace will continue to improve as the competition for qualified workers should intensify over the next decade."
But one thing that hasn't changed over the past decade is that the best companies still outperform their peers.
According to Russell Investment Group analysis, a portfolio of publicly traded "100 Best" stocks, started in 1998 and reinvested annually to reflect changes in the list, would yield a 14.6 per cent return today, nearly triple the return of the S&P 500 average.
[267 words]
Source: Management-Issues
http://www.management-issues.com/news/3909/work-life-balance-key-to-being-the-best/
U.S. could catch Russia’s cold: Shilling
By Suzanne O'Halloran
[Time 6]
Will Russia’s economic meltdown spark another global financial crisis similar to what the world experienced in 1998? That’s the question investors are wrestling with. The Market Vectors Russia ETF (RSX) swung between positive and negative territory before closing higher Tuesday, while the S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) followed a similar pattern ending the session 0.85% lower. “The markets are telling us there is something else there,” cautions Gary Shilling, founder, of A. Gary Shilling.
There are plenty of reasons Russia is in trouble, including the fallout from the Federal Reserve and OPEC, notes Shilling. “The Fed is no longer pumping money out there, and on top of that the Saudis basically decided not to cut production and that left Russia high and dry.”
Russia derives nearly 70% of its export revenue from oil and gas which is why the 41% drop in WTI crude since January has become so perilous. The ruble has fallen more than 50% against the U.S. dollar while Russian stocks, as tracked by the SPDR S&P Russia ETF (RBL), have fallen by the same amount.
In an attempt to calm the chaos, President Putin and his central bankers raised interest rates to 17% Tuesday. It's still unclear whether those moves will prevent a contagion effect. “Does this cause real financial problems that simply spill over, do we get a big selloff in U.S. stocks? So far I don’t think that is completely clear but it certainly is possible.” said Shilling.
U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry also weighed in on Russia’s fiscal problems while speaking to reporters in London Tuesday. “It goes without saying that the purpose of the European-U.S.-et al effort with respect to sanctions was to make it clear to Russia, to President Putin, that there are costs attached to the unilateral annexation of Crimea and the continued support for separatists within Ukraine.”
[308 words]
Source: Yahoo Finance
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/will-the-u-s--catch-russia-s-cold--203719563.html
|
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册
x
|