- UID
- 852313
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2013-1-25
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
沙发
楼主 |
发表于 2014-12-8 23:22:56
|
只看该作者
Part II: Speed
Left or right wing?
To great tits, tradition seems important
Dec 6th 2014 | From the print edition
[Time 2]
IN THE days when milk was delivered each morning to the doorstep of almost every house in Britain, enterprising great tits sometimes learned to peck through the foil bottle-tops to get at the goodies beneath. These avian pioneers were quickly imitated by others, with the result that cream-pillaging populations emerged in several parts of the country. Cream-pillaging was one of the first recognised examples of animal culture: the transmission of behaviour from one individual to another, so that it persists down the generations. But, oddly, it was never followed up experimentally in the wild, to understand the nuances of the process.
That has just changed, with the publication in Nature of an experiment which Lucy Aplin of Oxford University conducted in nearby Wytham Wood probably the most intensively studied habitat on the planet. Most of the great tits in this wood are known individuals, and are fitted with transponders so that they can be followed around. Dr Aplin was thus able to track in some detail how behaviour spreads, and also how tits, like people, often seem pressed into social conformity.
Wytham has several subpopulations of great tits, each living in its own neck of the wood. Dr Aplin captured two males from each of eight of these areas, to act as her initial experimental subjects. Instead of milk bottles, she and her colleagues used specially devised boxes that, if manipulated correctly, deliver a tasty mealworm to a tit. Each box has a sliding door at the front, painted blue on the left and red on the right. Opening it either way will yield a worm, but the captured tits did not know this. Those from two of the subpopulations were taught, by letting them watch how a savvy demonstrator bird did it, that sliding the door leftward was a rewarding behaviour. Those from three other subpopulations were taught to slide it rightward. Those from the remaining three parts of the wood were taught nothing, and acted as controls. The team then scattered the wood with boxes, 250 metres apart, and released the captured birds whence they had come.
[342 words]
[Time 3]
In the areas where the released birds knew how to open the boxes, the others quickly learned to do so. After the boxes had been out for 20 days over the course of a month, three-quarters of the resident tits had opened a box at least once, almost always using the method introduced by the re-released males. In one of the three control areas, half managed it, by copying birds who had worked the mechanism out by trial and error. But in the other two controls, only a pitiful 9% and 31% of the tits opened a box even once.
These results suggest that, for great tits, traditions are easy to create. To find out how persistent such traditions are, Dr Aplin and her colleagues came back nine months later (a period in which, on average half the resident tits had died and been replaced by other individuals) and put some of the boxes out again. They found three things. First, enough tits in each area remembered the old days well enough to raid the boxes, thus enabling others to learn how to do so. Second, the tradition of whether to open to the left or to the right was preserved. Third, tits that had moved (as some did) from an area with a different tradition changed their behaviour to conform with local practice.
Why that should be, Dr Aplin does not know. But it suggests that, like human beings, great tits are conformists at heart.
[246 words]
Source: The Economist
http://www.economist.com/news/science-and-technology/21635451-great-tits-tradition-seems-important-left-or-right-wing
Turing, the changes
Google revamps how it tests whether a website visitor is human
Dec 5th 2014 | SEATTLE | Science and technology
[Time 4]
IN THE end, the robots won. On December 3rd, Google announced that it was radically changing its ReCAPTCHA system, the sort of prove-you're-a-human-and-not-automated-software test that has become all but ubiquitous online. In April, Google researchers published a paper showing that their computer-vision software could decipher their own squashed and twisted images 99.8% of the time.
For many, it comes as little surprise that algorithms can now nearly always beat a CAPTCHA. This is a tortured acronym that stands for "completely automated public Turing test to tell computers and humans apart", and refers to a notional test devised by Alan Turing, a British code-breaker and computer-science pioneer, in which humans test a machine to see if it can think. CAPTCHAs are the reverse, administered by a machine to make sure the user is of the thinking sort.
It was inevitable that computer-vision research would advance to a point that CAPTCHA text that was in any way legible to humans would also be legible to the machines they had taught. In 2009, Luis von Ahn, the founder of ReCAPTCHA (the sort that presents two images, one of which is designed to make the user extract useful bits of text from an image, such as a scan of a newspaper page or a house number in a photograph), told The Economist that "it will be possible for software to break text CAPTCHAs most of the time within five years." He was spot on.
The April paper came out of work on text recognition in images from the firm's Street View archive, and of course on ReCAPTCHA's arms race to defeat increasingly sophisticated artificial intelligence. Vinay Shet, the product manager for the service, said that the outcome was proof that decrypting squiggly text alone was no longer enough to separate the men from the 'bots. However, Mr Shet says, Google had already developed a sophisticated risk-analysis system that could do the same job by different means.
[322 words]
[Time 5]
The solution which may seem fantastically simple by comparison to some of the textual hoops web denizens have had to jump through in recent years is to ask a user to check a box that reads, quite simply, "I'm not a robot". From particulars that arise in the act of visiting the page and checking the box, the firm's software can acquire a host of signals of humanity. Dr Shet was loth to share the recipe for the test's secret sauce, but it surely includes parameters about the connection, such as the network address from which the browser summoned the page. The sum of those attributes may be enough to pass the test; if not, it will also offer pictures of cats, dogs and turkeys for users to identify, which 'bots are poor at matching. Computer vision has come far, but still has some way to go with certain visual tasks that humans find simple.
No doubt the robots will get better, for getting past CAPTCHAs is big business. Firms that want to purchase large blocks of event tickets stand to make much in the resale market, as do the people who wish to register enormous numbers of email accounts only to sell the bogus addresses to spammers. So it is that Google's latest move, as with so much of online security, is just the next stage of a cat-and-mouse game. But the firm is active on both sides; the artificial intelligence systems that the new CAPTCHA system aims to thwart are being taught how to think about, for example, what a cat is by seeing which picture real humans choose.
With what amounts to billions of CAPTCHA solutions already processed and billions more to come, Google is breeding the next generation of bots that will fool the systems it has just deployed. Who knows what hoops real humans will eventually have to jump through just to get seats at the theatre.
[322 words]
Source: The Economist
http://www.economist.com/news/science-and-technology/21635694-google-revamps-how-it-tests-whether-website-visitor-human-turing-changes
A cool idea
New materials may change the way temperatures are regulated
Nov 29th 2014 | From the print editio
[Time 6]
AIR conditioning is a transformative technology. It has made the world's torrid climes pleasanter to live in, and enabled the siesta-free working habits of the temperate regions to move closer to the equator. But cooling buildings takes a lot of energy. Heat must be pumped actively from their interiors to their exteriors. Fully 15% of the electricity used by buildings in the United States is devoted to this task. If an idea dreamed up by Aaswath Raman of Stanford University and his colleagues comes to fruition, that may change. Dr Raman has invented a way to encourage buildings to dump their heat without the need for pumps and compressors. Instead, they simply radiate it into outer space.
The idea, described in this week's Nature, is both cunning and simple. Outer space is very cold (about 3°C above absolute zero) and very big, so it is the perfect heat sink. Earth radiates heat into it all the time. But this is compensated for by the heat the planet receives from the sun. To encourage one part of Earth's surface (such as an individual building) to cool down, all you need do in principle is reflect the sunlight which falls on it back into space, while also encouraging as much radiative cooling from it as possible.
To try to turn principle into practice Dr Raman has made a material which reflects 97% of sunlight while itself radiating at a wavelength of between eight and 13 microns (or millionths of a metre), which is where the atmosphere is most transparent. Production of the material is made possible with modern manufacturing methods. It consists of four layers of silicon dioxide interspersed with three of hafnium dioxide. Each of these seven layers is of a different, precisely defined thickness, ranging from 13 to 688 nanometres (or billionths of a metre). It is backed by a layer of silver 200 nanometres thick, to act as a mirror.
The result, a sheet with a total thickness of less than two microns, is the photonic equivalent of a semiconductor: it does to light what a semiconductor does to electricity, namely manipulates its energy levels. Since, optically speaking, energy levels correspond to wavelengths, such an arrangement can be tweaked to reflect some wavelengths and preferentially emit others. And that, in choosing the layers' pedantically exact dimensions, is just what Dr Raman and his colleagues have done.
[397 words]
[The rest]
Polythene plan
They worked out on a computer how thick those layers needed to be to reflect pretty much the entire solar spectrum while, at the same time, shedding infra-red light at the frequency which can most easily escape from Earth into outer space. And then they made it, to see if it works.
It does. Mounted on a silicon wafer to keep it flat, held in a specially designed box made of Mylar, polythene, polystyrene, acrylic and wood, to minimise the conduction of heat into it from its surroundings, and then left outside on a sunny, albeit rather wintry Californian day, the photonic sheet settled down to a temperature 4.9°C cooler than its surroundings. If it were thermally connected to those surroundings, rather than isolated from them, that temperature difference would disappear, but the result would be to cool the surroundings slightly.
Turning this discovery into a useful device will be a journey down a long road. Dr Raman and his colleagues have, however, taken the first step by working out that they should be able to replace the hafnium dioxide (which is expensive) with titanium dioxide (which is cheap). They will probably need to replace the silver, too, though the cost of silicon dioxide, also known as sand, is not so much of a problem.
The process will also have to be scaled up. And it will work only on those parts of a building (mainly the roof) that have a clear view of the sky, and thus of outer space, so it will not replace air conditioning completely. But the idea of even part of a building's cooling system being electricity-free is an attractive one, so this may be the start of something really cool.
Source: The Economist
http://www.economist.com/news/science-and-technology/21634992-new-materials-may-change-way-temperatures-are-regulated-cool-idea
|
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册
x
|