prep上的一道题关于省略的问题NNNN快来帮忙

sunyuwei

Constructed at least as early as the Sui dynasty (A.D, 581-618). the Altar of Heaven is the oldest known altar used in Chinese state religious practice, more than 1.000 years older than a similar one in Beijing, it is the only altar found so far that predates the Qing dynasty (A.D. 1644-1912).

A. Constructed at least as early as the Sui dynasty (A.D. 581-618), the Altar of Heaven is the oldest known altar used in Chinese state religious practice, more than 1,000 years older than a similar one in Beijing, it is

B. Constructed at least as early as the Sui dynasty (A.D. 581-618), the Altar of Heaven, the oldest known altar used in Chinese state religious practice, is more than 1,000 years older than a similar one in Beijing and is

C. The Altar of Heaven, having been constructed at least as early as the Sui dynasty (A.D. 581-618) and the oldest known altar used in Chinese state religious practice, is more than 1,000 years older than a similar one in Beijing and

D. The Altar of Heaven, which was constructed at least as early as the Sui dynasty (A.D. 581-618) and is the oldest known altar used in Chinese state religious practice, more than 1,000 years older than a similar one in Beijing and is

E. The oldest known altar used in Chinese state religious practice, more than 1,000 years older than a similar one in Beijing, the Altar of Heaven, which was constructed at least as early as the Sui dynasty (A.D. 581-618) and is

A: it is 跟前面句子没有连词

B: correct

C: and前后不对称；第二个and的两个is不是一个结构不能省

D: more than … and is 不平行

E: 无主语

注意：

1、 was … and is … 可以平行，只要有明确的时间状语表明。比如GWD兵马俑

2、 is and is可以省略只能是相同功能的is

关于解析里面注意点的第二点is and is 相同功能的可以省略，想问为什么C 里面两个is不是一个功能，做的都是系动词不是吗？

sunyuwei

我再坚持一下！

popup

The Altar of Heaven is more than 1,000 years older than a similar one in Beijing and the only altar found so far that predates the Qing dynasty.

我个人感觉C里面is不能省去的原因是省去会造成歧义：可能让读者理解为The Altar of Heaven is more than 1,000 years older than A and B。

sunyuwei

popup 发表于 2014-10-5 10:30
The Altar of Heaven is more than 1,000 years older than a similar one in Beijing and the only altar  ...

额。。有这种情况的可能。
说到歧义，我给你的回复贴里也提到了，是指逻辑上和语法上会有矛盾还是单指逻辑上有多种理解？
以这句话为例，如果是说逻辑上和语法上那么确实会产生歧义，因为语法上可以是The Altar of Heaven is more than 1,000 years older than A and B，但是逻辑上的含义是The Altar of Heaven is more than 1,000 years older than A and is B，所以产生歧义。
如果说是逻辑上多种理解，那么我认为没有歧义，因为前面已经提到the altar of heaven 所以后面不可能说他比the only altar 老因为他本身就是altar，所以逻辑上没有多种理解方式，因而没有问题。

对于所说的歧义，在指代或是修饰上都有类似问题，你是怎么想的呢？

popup

sunyuwei 发表于 2014-10-5 10:52
额。。有这种情况的可能。
说到歧义，我给你的回复贴里也提到了，是指逻辑上和语法上会有矛盾还是单指逻 ...

对于歧义的定义，我没有你理解的那么深入哈，我理解的很肤浅，就是当一个句子所表达的意思不唯一的时候就算歧义了。比如既可以这么解释，又可以那么解释。。。关于逻辑和语法间，我还真心没想过哈~

sunyuwei

popup 发表于 2014-10-6 13:39
对于歧义的定义，我没有你理解的那么深入哈，我理解的很肤浅，就是当一个句子所表达的意思不唯一的时候就 ...

那如果说你发现有一种理解正常人都可以判断你还算他歧义吗？还是自动排除这种理解？
可能说的有点抽象===就比如说上个帖子里的猎人把鹿挂在墙上前面有一个火也可以指代，那你明知道猎人不可能把挂在墙上你还算他歧义吗？

popup

sunyuwei 发表于 2014-10-6 14:42
那如果说你发现有一种理解正常人都可以判断你还算他歧义吗？还是自动排除这种理解？
可能说的有点抽象=== ...

如果正常人一定能判断出就不算歧义了吧，不过我说的也不一定对哈~

sunyuwei

popup 发表于 2014-10-6 15:30
如果正常人一定能判断出就不算歧义了吧，不过我说的也不一定对哈~

我现在是越想越乱了===脑子跟浆糊无异===
对了 你是已经考完了还是还在考撒~

popup

sunyuwei 发表于 2014-10-6 15:51
我现在是越想越乱了===脑子跟浆糊无异===
对了 你是已经考完了还是还在考撒~ ...

我Gmat好久没碰了，所以建议仅供参考哈~

sunyuwei

popup 发表于 2014-10-6 16:38
我Gmat好久没碰了，所以建议仅供参考哈~

打算最近去考吗？我在想我什么时候去考考看