Part II: Speed
article2
The Monkey's Voyage
time2
By 26 million years ago, the ancestors of today’s New World monkeys had arrived in South America. How those primates reached the continent is something of a conundrum. The leading explanation has the animals floating across the Atlantic Ocean from Africa aboard a giant raft of vegetation.
The scenario may sound preposterous. But de Queiroz, an evolutionary biologist, uses fossil, genetic and geologic evidence to make a compelling case that a variety of plants and animals have dispersed on long-distance ocean voyages throughout evolutionary history.
The idea is not new: Charles Darwin and Alfred Russel ** were convinced that ocean voyages played a role in evolution. But by the mid-20th century, when geologists had verified plate tectonics and realized that continents are not stationary, the theory fell out of favor. Many biologists thought that sea level changes and continental breakups better explain how closely related organisms can end up on opposite sides of an ocean. Proponents of the vicariance hypothesis, in which a barrier divides a species’ range, were dogmatic — they “seemed a bit like an unruly cult,” de Queiroz writes — and ridiculed those who thought creatures could sail on the high seas and survive.
But in example after example — from amphibians to flightless birds — de Queiroz challenges the vicariance camp’s dogma. Over the last several decades, evidence of ocean journeys has piled up. For instance, the fossil record and genetic analyses that estimate when lineages diverged indicate that New World monkeys split from Old World monkeys and apes at least 50 million years after South America and Africa broke apart. That leaves a transatlantic trip as the only reasonable way primates could have migrated to the New World.
Although de Queiroz is unlikely to persuade staunch vicariance advocates, The Monkey’s Voyage is a captivating look at one of biogeography’s most puzzling problems, with just the right balance between science and scientific drama [328]
source:
https://www.sciencenews.org/article/monkeys-voyage
article3
Ha! The Science of When We Laugh and Why
time3
It’s certainly possible to over-analyze a joke. But can the same be said for humor as a whole? Considering the abundant research on the topic, maybe not.
Scott Weems, a neuroscientist, takes readers on a wide-ranging tour that explains what humor is and why readers should care. Turns out, humor influences health and social well-being in many ways.
Humor improves interpersonal relationships, and studies show that simply watching a funny movie can lower stress, improve immune system response and even help viewers better solve problems.
The complexity of the human brain makes humor possible, Weems argues, and it also helps explain how some people can find a joke hilarious while others deem it grossly offensive.
Humor takes many forms — as many as 44 by one researcher’s count — but shares certain traits and themes. From puns and riddles to slapstick, humor is inherently subversive, Weems says, often treating serious subjects with frivolity or even rudeness. Prisoners of war and others in dire situations, for instance, often turn to dark humor.
Ha! isn’t a self-help guide to being funny, though a careful reader can find useful nuggets throughout. The funniest jokes carry a little edginess, but not too much. Surprise helps, too, whether it’s the incongruity of an elephant hiding in a cherry tree or the absolute improbability of Raquel Welch and the pope ending up in the same lifeboat.
The final chapter divulges Weems’ semisuccessful attempt at stand-up comedy. He got a few laughs, he says, but not where he expected them. Maybe practice does make perfect: The joke that got Weems the most laughs, and judged by one website’s readers as the best in the world, is a story that he had practiced many dozens, maybe hundreds, of times. [302]
Source:
https://www.sciencenews.org/article/ha-science-when-we-laugh-and-why
article4
This winter warrior made the gravitational waves discovery possible
time4
The wind chill is −80° Celsius when Steffen Richter, donning a red parka, hops on a snowmobile and heads to work. Lighting his path are the stars, a sliver of moon and the faint green glow of the aurora australis, the southern lights.
It’s the kind of day that might make him miss home — but Boston is nearly 15,000 kilometers away, and no pilot would dare fly anywhere near Richter’s location for months. Plus, the Harvard engineer has a job to do. Hitched to Richter’s snowmobile is a vat of liquid helium, the lifeblood of a telescope built at the far end of the world to detect and dissect the universe’s oldest light.
On March 17, several scientists sat in a climate-controlled auditorium at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics to announce that their South Pole telescope, BICEP2, had detected ripples in spacetime dating back to a trillionth of a trillionth of a trillionth of a second after the Big Bang (SN: 4/5/14, p. 6). It’s a potentially Nobel Prize–winning discovery, and it could not have been made without Richter. His daily maintenance checks and semiweekly helium deliveries during three consecutive Antarctic winters allowed BICEP2 to remain fixated on exposing the earliest moments of the universe.
Spending a winter at the planet’s southernmost point is the ultimate commitment. The Amundsen–Scott research station there is inaccessible by air for nearly nine months of the year, eliminating any opportunity for escape. Once the sun dips below the horizon in March, it doesn’t return until September, leaving behind a frigid, dry environment that’s ideal for astronomical observation but abysmal for human habitation. [291]
time5
That doesn’t bother Richter, an adventurer whose passions include riding motorbikes in remote parts of the world. In his nine winters at the polar station (which put him in a tie for the most spent there), he has served as the only line of engineering defense for several multimillion-dollar experiments. Two of the biggest are BICEP and IceCube, which recently detected neutrinos from beyond the solar system (SN: 12/28/13, p. 6). Every day, he trekked out in temperatures averaging 58 degrees Celsius below zero to inspect the instruments and their data.
BICEP2, which Richter oversaw for the winters of 2010 through 2012, required extra attention. Even in the pole’s frigid temperatures, the telescope needed to be kept much colder to detect radiation emitted just after the Big Bang, which hovers just a few degrees above absolute zero. Missing one delivery of liquid helium coolant could cripple the telescope for weeks. “You have to do it no matter what the weather is,” he says. “Running out of liquid helium is not an option.”
The rest of his time, he was bonding with the roughly 50 scientists, doctors, cooks, electricians, plumbers and others operating the research station. They ate together, shared stories and performed feats possible only during polar winters: Richter is a proud member of the 300 Club, having run outside naked in -100 degree Fahrenheit temperatures after roasting in a 200-degree sauna.
He plans to return to the South Pole later this year to install upgrades for the new and improved BICEP3 telescope. But he won’t spend the winter — the team found another willing victim to take his place. “I have high confidence in him,” Richter says of his stand-in. “Hopefully he’ll be great so that I won’t have to do it every year.”[313]
Source:
https://www.sciencenews.org/article/winter-warrior-made-gravitational-waves-discovery-possible
article5
Skewed gender ratios turn bird world into a soap opera
time6
It can be easy to romanticize birds. After all, some 90 percent of bird species are monogamous. And there are sweet stories like maleemperor penguins that keep eggs warm and hornbills that sing duets together.
But when adult populations become dominated by one gender, all that sweetness, it seems, hides worlds of wrecked relationships and promiscuity, report András Liker of Sheffield University in England and colleagues in the April 14 Current Biology.
Liker and his team began by compiling data on 187 bird species, examining information on a population’s gender ratio of adults, polygamy, infidelity and rates of divorce — when a pair of birds separates or just doesn’t get back together in the following breeding season. Then the researchers looked for patterns in that data. Monogamy began to unravel when one gender dominated, but there were differences between male-dominated and female-dominated populations.
In female-dominated societies, divorce was twice as common as in species with more males. Divorce can happen in various ways: A paired-up male might desert his mate when she’s been fooling around, or he might leave to pair up with a female with better qualities. Male blue-footed boobies (Sula nebouxii) are known to split up with his mate for those reasons.
Or when there aren’t enough males to go around, an unpaired female might horn in on another relationship, breaking a pair up so that she can get a mate. North Island brown kiwis (Apteryx mantelli) are thought to go that route.
In bird societies that have more of one gender, the rarer sex often takes advantage of the wealth of potential mates to play the field — polygamy becomes more common. This can happen whether it’s the girls or guys with the improved mating opportunities, but it’s a bit more common when males are fewer in number, the researchers report.
When males are greater in number, there’s more infidelity. This could be because females have more opportunity to try out different mates. But it could also have a more sinister source — males that can’t find permanent mates may take to forcing unwilling females.
When Science News’ Susan Milius wrote about bird divorce in 1998, researchers weren’t ready to apply any of their bird knowledge to humans, but it seems that times have changed. “Our results in birds show striking parallels with studies in humans,” Liker and colleagues write. “For instance, divorce rates are higher in both birds and humans in female-biased than in male-biased populations.” They’re still not saying that human and bird populations are alike when it comes to romance, but they note that the bird studies point to some areas of human relationships that might be worthy of more study.[472]
Source:
https://www.sciencenews.org/blog/wild-things/skewed-gender-ratios-turn-bird-world-soap-opera
|