ChaseDream
搜索
12345下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 6090|回复: 45
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[阅读小分队] 【Native Speaker每日综合训练—32系列】【32-05】经管

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2014-2-12 22:20:59 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Official weibo: http://weibo.com/u/3476904471


Part I: Speaker

Article 1   

Steven Addis: A father-daughter bond, one photo at a time



[Rephrase 1]

[Speech, 3: 38]

MP3:

Source : TED
http://www.ted.com/talks/steven_addis_a_father_daughter_bond_one_photo_at_a_time.html

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2014-2-12 22:21:00 | 只看该作者
  Part II: Speed                        
Article 2              

The Origin of the 8 Hour Work Day and Why We Should Rethink It



[Time 2]

One of the most unchanged elements of our life today is our optimal work time or how long we should work -- generally, every person I've spoken to quotes me something close to 8 hours a day.

And data seems to confirm that: The average American works 8.8 hours every day. At least, those are the official statistics from the Bureau of Labor Statistics:

And yet, for most of us it is obvious that knowing how long the average person works every day has little to do with how efficient or productive that pattern is. At least, that is what I personally found for my own productivity. So what's the the right hourly rate?

With success stories from people working 4 hours a week, to 16 hours a day, it's hard to know if there is an optimal amount. So instead of going with my gut, which often fails me, I thought of looking into actual research on work time and how to optimize it for your happiness and success.

[170 words]

[Time 3]
Why do we have 8 hour work days in the first place?

Let's start out with what we have right now. The typical work day is around 8 hours. But how did we come up with that? The answer is hidden in the tidings of the Industrial revolution.

In the late 18th century, when companies started to maximize the output of their factories, getting to running them 24/7 was key. Now of course, to make things more efficient, people had to work more. In fact, 10-16 hour days were the norm.

These incredibly long work days weren't sustainable and soon a brave man called Robert Owen started a campaign to have people work no more than 8 hours per day.  His slogan was "Eight hours labour, eight hours recreation, eight hours rest."

It wasn't until much later that Ford actually implemented the 8 hour work day and changed the standards:

One of the first businesses to implement this was the Ford Motor Company, in 1914, which not only cut the standard work day to eight hours, but also doubled their worker's pay in the process.  To the shock of many industries, this resulted in Ford's productivity off of these same workers, but with fewer hours, actually increasing significantly and Ford's profit margins doubled within two years.  This encouraged other companies to adopt the shorter, eight hour work day as a standard for their employees.

So there we have it. The reason we work 8 hours a day, isn't scientific or much thought out. It's purely a century old norm for running factories most efficiently

[264 words]

[Time 4]

Manage energy not time: How long we work isn't important & the Ultradian Rhythm

Without wanting to fall into the same trap, it's time to ask a better question. How many hours we work every day is barely important in today's creative economy.

Instead, the right focus is your energy, according to famous author Tony Schwartz: "Manage your energy, not your time."

Schwartz explains that as humans we have four different types of energies to manage every day:
     Your physical energy -- how healthy are you? (We've written about that part before)

Your emotional energy -- how happy are you?

Your mental energy -- how well can you focus on something?

Your spiritual energy -- why are you doing all of this? What is your purpose?

One of the things most of us easily forget is that as humans, we are distinctly different from machines. At the core, this means that machines move linearly and humans move cyclically.

For an efficient work day, that truly respects our human nature, the first thing to focus on are ultradian cycles.

The basic understanding is that our human minds can focus on any given task for 90-120 minutes. Afterwards, a 20-30 minute break is required for us to get the renewal to achieve high performance for our next task again. Here is a better representation of the ultradian rhythm:




So instead of thinking about "What can I get done in an 8 hour day," I've started to change my thinking to "What can I get done in a 90 min session".
Now that we know we got to split everything in 90 min chunks, it's time to break down those 90 minutes sessions further.

[281 words]

[Time 5]

The core of a productive work day: Focus

The one most crucial to understanding our workflows is how well we can focus. In a stunning research project Justin Gardner found that to actually focus on something our brain uses a 2-step process:

  • "Sensitivity enhancement": It means you see a scene or setup and take all the information in that is presented. Then you focus in on what needs your attention. Kind of like "a blurry photo that slowly starts to come into focus", describes Lifehacker.
  •   "Efficient selection":  This is now the actual zooming in on a task happens. This allows us to enter into what Mihály Csíkszentmihályi calls "Flow" state. Now our actual work on a task happens.

The follow figure probably describes it best:


In figure A, as our brain is presented with only 1 task, we are able to separate out distractors (blue) from what's actually important (yellow).
In figure B, as we are presented with multiple tasks at once, our brain is increasingly easy to distract and combines the actual tasks with distractors.
The key conclusion that Gardner suggests from his study is that we have to both:

  • Stop multitasking to avoid being distracted in our work environment.

  • Eliminate distractors even when only 1 task is present

Sounds fairly obvious right? And yet, getting it actually done every day is much easier said then done. The good news is that after all, we can even actually change our brain structure from learning to focus. Here are some hands on tips:

[255 words]

[Time 6]

The top 4 tips for improving your work day:

For my daily workflow at Buffer, I've started to make 4 distinct changes to implement the above research better. Here is what worked the best:

Manually increase the relevance of a task: Now, a lot of us still might struggle to find the focus, especially if no one set a deadline to it. Overriding your attention system, and adding your own deadline together with a reward has shown some of the most significant improvements for task completion according to researcher Keisuke Fukuda.

Split your day into 90 min windows:Here is something I've started to do. Instead of looking at a 8, 6 or 10 hour work day, split it down and say you've got 4, 5 or however many 90 minute windows. That way you will be able to have 4 tasks that you can get done every day much more easily.

Plan your rest so you actually rest:"The fittest person is not the one who runs the fastest, but the one who has optimized their rest time." Says Tony Schwartz. A lot of the time, we are so busy planning our work day, that we forget about "how" to rest. Plan beforehand what you will do your rest. Here are some ideas: Nap, read, meditate, get a snack.

Zero notifications:One of the best ideas I've ever had was to follow Joel's advice on Zero Notifications. Having absolutely no counter on my phone or computer changing from 0 to 1 and always breaking my focus has been a huge help. If you haven't tried this yet, try to turn off every digital element that could become an alert.

Personally, my life has been pretty much turned upside down after implementing these findings over the past few weeks. And I couldn't be happier. I get both more done and feel happier at the same time.

Oh and as a follow-up post to this one, you might also enjoy "The science of how temperature and lighting impacts our productivity" as well as "The 4 elements of physical energy and how to master them."

Over to you now, what do you think is the best structure of work days?I'd love your insights on this topic.

[371 words]

Source: Huffington Post

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/leonhard-widrich/the-origin-of-the-8-hour-_b_4524488.html#!


本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2014-2-12 22:21:01 | 只看该作者
Part III: Obstacle

Article3      
From dodo to phoenix


[Paraphrase 7]

Adam Smith once said that “there is a great deal of ruin in a nation.” There is also a great deal of ruin in some kinds of business organisations. Management theorists have been predicting the death of conglomerates for decades. Stockmarkets apply a “conglomerate discount” to the price of their shares. Investors argue that it is better to bet on several focused companies than a single diversified one. Business writers routinely apply the adjectives “bloated” and “unwieldy” when mentioning conglomerates. And yet, almost everywhere, they continue to thrive.

The contrast between theory and practice is forcing management gurus to reconsider. The academic literature is bristling with second thoughts on conglomerates. Some articles are gung-ho: December’s Harvard Business Review explained “Why Conglomerates Thrive (Outside the US)”. Some are fence-sitting: September’s Journal of Corporate Finance asked, “Conglomerates on the Rise Again?” The Journal of Financial Economics and the Strategic Management Journal have also weighed in.

Conglomerates are at the heart of the Asian miracle: consultants at McKinsey calculate that over the past decade conglomerates made up about 80% of the largest 50 companies by revenue in South Korea; and their revenues grew on average by 11% a year. In India conglomerates constituted 90% of the top 50 companies (excluding state firms), and had average revenue growth of 23% a year. Tarun Khanna of Harvard Business School has argued that emerging-world conglomerates are transient phenomena: they have thrived because businesses need to compensate for the underdeveloped nature of the local market (or fill in “institutional voids”, as he puts it). They will have to focus as those markets develop, he says. But the opposite seems to be happening. The past decade has seen institutional voids being filled in rapidly across the emerging world. But conglomerates have outperformed their more focused rivals. South Korea and Singapore have joined the ranks of developed economies, yet their conglomerates still thrive. Emerging-world conglomerates such as the Tata group have also succeeded in the rich world.

J. Ramachandran of the Indian Institute of Management Bangalore says all this shows that conglomerates are not just a symptom of a difficult business climate; they have advantages that more streamlined firms lack. They can cross-pollinate ideas across different businesses: Tata’s Swach, a cheap water-purifier, incorporates expertise from both Tata Consulting Services and Tata Chemicals. They can also cross-subsidise risky ventures: Mahindra Group, another Indian giant, could rely on its solid tractor-making business as it took a punt on time-share properties; now Mahindra Holidays & Resorts is valued at more than $500m.

Mr Ramachandran says that, unlike the typical American conglomerate, those in the emerging world often have one person or family as the dominant owner. Despite this, their divisions have more independence than the typical Western conglomerate’s do: they often have separate boards and stockmarket listings. These groups’ parent companies vary enormously in their competence, Mr Ramachandran notes. Some are “evangelical architects” that focus on shaping the industries they enter. Others are “absentee landlords” that just extract rent. That said, the overall quality is going up. Tata’s decision to create a group executive office in 1998 to explore synergies between different businesses soon found imitators among other Indian conglomerates.

The rich world’s hostile climate for conglomerates since the 1960s has meant that only the fittest survive. Adaptability is key: GE, the T. rex of the clade, this week took the latest step in its continual reinvention by buying three medical companies. Guided by Warren Buffett’s management philosophy and financed by its profits from insurance, Berkshire Hathaway, with its roots in textiles, has moved into everything from railways to newspapers.

As in emerging economies, Western conglomerates enjoy advantages that focused businesses lack: In “The Deep-Pocket Effect of Internal Capital Markets”, Xavier Boutin of the European Commission and his co-authors demonstrate that diverse French business groups routinely use their deep pockets to dissuade competitors from entering their markets or to force their way into new markets themselves. Rich-world conglomerates did relatively well in the financial crisis: Christin Rudolph and Bernhard Schwetzler of Leipzig Graduate School of Management calculate that the conglomerate discount fell during the crisis from 12.7% to 6% in western Europe and from 10.8% to 7.2% in America. In the Asia-Pacific region conglomerates enjoy a stockmarket premium; it rose in the crisis. A world of scarce capital and volatile economies is one to which the conglomerate is well adapted.

Not all will fly

But this does not guarantee that every dodo will become a phoenix. Some conglomerates, especially in places like South-East Asia, depend heavily on their proprietors’ courting of politicians, and are thus at constant risk from regime change or pro-market reform. Many still sacrifice profits for market share, and will surely one day exhaust shareholders’ patience. A smaller conglomerate discount is still a discount.Even so, the revisionists of conglomerate theory are performing a valuable public service. They are right to point out that not all diversified business groups are alike: Tata has a very different internal organisation from GE’s, and both are run quite differently from Berkshire Hathaway. They are right to point out that management matters enormously: most emerging-world conglomerates are far better run today than they were a decade ago. There used to be a near-consensus among management thinkers that Western-style focused companies represented business’s version of the end of history. That is becoming ever harder to argue.

[936 words]

Source: Economist
http://www.economist.com/news/business/21593412-conglomerates-once-seen-heading-extinction-are-spreading-their-wings-dodo

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
地板
发表于 2014-2-12 22:22:58 | 只看该作者
沙发~~~感谢瓜瓜  
楼下的ACE,今天再来抢

Speaker:take an active role to creat memory.Taking a photo may be a good way.

00:50
It is difficult to know the optimal working time according to different efficiency.

01:08
The origin of 8-hour work time.

00:59
How long do we work is not important,instead,how we manage our energy is important.

00:51
Forcus on one task can improve productivity.

01:09
4 tips to make your work day more efficient.

05:56
Main Idea: The discussion on conglomerates
Experts have a negative opinion on conglomerates for many years.But contrast the theory,conglomerates make great success in the practice.And they play heart role in the rise of asian economy.Most of the asian great companies are conglomerates.
Moreover,conglomerates succeed in rich world.which demonstrate that conglomerate is not just symptom of a difficult businesss climate.It has its own advantages in several aspects.And the asian conglomerates are not like typocal western ones.They have their own features.
And olny fittest conglomerates in western economy can survive.So they have their own feastures and advantages.Several big companies such as GE began to become conglomerates.
But not all conglomerates can success.Different companies are facing different situations.The future can be a risk.
5#
发表于 2014-2-12 22:25:49 | 只看该作者
板凳。。。。还是晚了疏离一步啊

Speaker
A father-daughter bond, one photo at a time
One of the most important things we all make are memories, so taking an active role in consciously creating memories.

Speed
The Origin of the 8 Hour Work Day and Why We Should Rethink It
Time2: 55" looking into actual research on work time and how to optimize it for your happiness and success
Time3: 1'29" The reason we work 8 hours a day, isn't scientific or much thought out. It's purely a century old norm for running factories most efficiently
Time4: 1'50" According to Ultradian Rhythm, you should think about "What can I get done in a 90 min session"
Time5: 1'50" The core of a productive work day: Focus
Time6: 2'29" The top 4 tips for improving your work day

Obstacle
From dodo to phoenix
Time7: 8'06"
Why do conglomerates continue to thrive, especially in Asia?
The heart of the Asian miracle, cross-pollinate ideas across different businesses, one person or family as the dominant owner, divisions are more independent, enjoy advantages that focused business lack
This does not guarantee that every dodo will become a phoenix
6#
发表于 2014-2-12 22:36:55 | 只看该作者
SPK: introduce 15 important photographs in speaker's life--take an active role when makuing your memories.  外国版大萌子
SPD: 1.04   1.13   1.28   1.37   2.03   helpful article~
OB: 6.03
7#
发表于 2014-2-13 05:12:27 | 只看该作者
Thx, Olivia ~.   灰常期待明天的专题,据说可可期货涨的很欢。。。

49"
1'21"
1'25"
1'50"
2'05"

5'17"
8#
发表于 2014-2-13 06:17:50 | 只看该作者
先占坑,谢谢楼主!!!!

Speaker:
Th video is not working
15 pictures relfect not only physical changes but every way.
Taking the pictures create memory.
Speed
1--01:21
Average working hour a day of Ameriscan aged between 24 and 25 is 8.8 hours.
The hours of working is not correlated with the efficience.
2--01:30
The reason why we work 8 hours a day isn't  scientific, just an old norm for running factories most efficiently.
Ford is the first company adepted this strategy, then its productivity doubled within two years.
3--01:22
we should manage our energy instead of time.
Four different types of energies-- physical energy, emotional energy, mental energy and spiritual energy.
Human mind can focus on given task for 90-120 mins, then take 20-30 mins break to get the renewal.
4--01:23
The core of productivity is focus.
2 step -- enhance sensitivity of the information and zooming in on the task.
Avoid distactions-- stop mulititasking and elminate distractor en in one task
5--02:23
Four tips for improving work day:
1.split work time to 90 hours
2.pan the rest and acutally rest
3.Get off all the notification such as alarms from clock or cellphone
4.Comfortable environment
Obstacle--06:32
Conglomerte seems rising in Asia.
Examples are listed.
Someone said it is because getting the void marketing, but companies in south korea are not.
And it is not that easy to thrive.
9#
发表于 2014-2-13 08:31:35 | 只看该作者
占坑占坑!!!!
Speakr: Why I can't view it!!! Oh, my god!
Time 1: 2'33''
Time 2: 1'33''
Time 3: 1'35''
Time 4: 2'34''
Time 5: 1'42''
Obstacle: No time for this part...
10#
发表于 2014-2-13 08:43:35 | 只看该作者
olivia瓜瓜 发表于 2014-2-12 22:21
Part III: Obstacle

Article3      

掌管 6        00:11:42.82        00:25:32.01 Present a phenomena which experts regard as a transient phenomena is changing some smell company to conglomerate. Management theorists have been describing it as dodo to phoenix.
掌管 5        00:03:15.10        00:13:49.18 There are four tips help you when you are working.
掌管 4        00:02:32.47        00:10:34.08 The central of a efficient working time is focus, the man's study present that if you brain eliminate a direction, then only 1 task can be down. If you distract , several part is working.
掌管 3        00:02:42.57        00:08:01.60 The best management is to manage you energy, but not to manage you time.
掌管 2        00:03:01.22        00:05:19.03 The history of 8 hour work.
掌管 1        00:02:17.81        00:02:17.81 Present a question, why we rought the 8 hour schedule。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-4-26 05:08
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部