- UID
- 802472
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2012-9-3
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
第一次发作业呐!加油,加油,不过下次想少写一点,第一次写作业,花了不少时间,下次要高效一点,fighting!
Time1: 00:04:29.78
shifting temperatures and rainfall expected to alter animal lifestyles, including the timing of migration and shift of ranges. An example of a kind of bee is given to buttress the argument.
Time2: 00:03:05.92
climate change could affect the lifestyle of a tropical frog by altering the moisture related to the frog’s eggs. At the same time, climate change might affect behavior and mental capacilities of organisms, namely mental powers.
Time3 00:02:09.06
Human being is responsible for climate change by burning fossil fuels, resulting the rising temperature, which dramatically alter agriculture and ecosystems around the world
Time4 00:01:50.53
The panel makes a bleaker prediction of the climate, while some other people who are not the members of the panel don’t agree that human is the cause of the climate change.
Time5 00:02:21.63
Antarctic glass sponge grows very fast because of the warmer climate and more sun-light, but this trend will not go to far because its predators will predate it and other creatures will compete the resources.
Obstacle: 00:08:47.57
The IPCC’s argument is soundless that we can emit a trillion tons of carbon and still avoid major warming in the following aspects. Firstly, solar energy is not a way to diminish emission in that emissions jumped 3.8 percent the following year, and over the last 10 years, on average, emissions decreased by just 1 percent per year
Secondly, although natural gas can cut emissions in half compared to coal, but it still emits carbon dioxide.
Thirdly, renewable power is not the way people used to consider a way to reduce carbon emission, for example, the wind power is not really zero-emission.
Furthermore, Tesla Model S and zero-emission cars are both not as efficient as the gas-powered cars.
Besides, the cars with existing technology will continue working on the road so that they will not be more efficient until 2050.
Lastly, it is not possible to change people’s driving habits, so it is not a good way to require people to drive less.
|
|