918 一站

捏捏lee

作文 之前机经上有的 就是luxury 的车和 inexpensive的车摆在展厅中心后 人们更愿意购买luxury的那一款 还提到了2月和6月等信息 那一篇
IR 想不起来了
阅读 记得有一篇是 有关 solid mantle 还是liquid mantle的  还有一篇大概是关于oral poetry 和 什么的 实在是忘了


今天答所有题都时间紧紧的 最后几道题全都慌神了 哎   

fan850925

楼主 你那个 oral poetry  能在回忆一点点吗？ 具体内容啥的

fan850925

楼主 你快回来  我搜遍了考古库 都没有 这个， 我上国外网站找了 貌似一篇很像的你看看  有点长 英文的 拜托的了:

While a new surge of critical interest in the ancient Greek poems conventionally ascribed to Homer has taken place in the last twenty years or so, it was nonspecialists rather than professional scholars who studied the poetic aspects of the Iliad and the Odyssey between, roughly, 1935 and 1970. During these years, while such nonacademic intellectuals as Simone Weil and Erich Auerbach were trying to define the qualities that made these epic accounts of the Trojan War and its aftermath great poetry, the questions that occupied the specialists were directed elsewhere: ?Did the Trojan War really happen?? ?Does the bard preserve Indo-European folk memories?? ?How did the poems get written down?? Something was driving scholars away from the actual works to peripheral issues.

Scholars produced books about archaeology, about gift-exchange in ancient societies, about the development of oral poetry, about virtually anything except the Iliad and the Odyssey themselves as unique reflections or distillations of life itself?as, in short, great poetry. The observations of the English poet Alexander Pope seemed as applicable in 1970 as they had been when he wrote them in 1715: according to Pope, the remarks of critics ?are rather Philosophical, Historical, Geographic?or rather anything than Critical and Poetical.?

Ironically, the modern manifestation of this ?nonpoetical? emphasis can be traced to the profoundly influential work of Milman Parry, who attempted to demonstrate in detail how the Homeric poems, believed to have been recorded nearly three thousand years ago, were the products of a long and highly developed tradition of oral poetry about the Trojan War. Parry proposed that this tradition built up its diction and its content by a process of constant accumulation and refinement over many generations of storytellers. But after Parry?s death in 1935, his legacy was taken up by scholars who, unlike Parry, forsook intensive analysis of the poetry itself and focused instead on only one element of Parry?s work: the creative limitations and possibilities of oral composition, concerning on fixed elements and inflexibilities, focusing on the things that oral poetry allegedly can and cannot do. The dryness if this kind of study drove many of the more inventive scholars away from the poems into the rapidly developing field of Homer?s archaeological and historical background.
Appropriately, Milman Parry?s son Adam was among those scholars responsible for a renewed interest in Homer?s poetry as literary art. Building on his father?s work, the younger Parry argued that the Homeric poems exist both within and against a tradition. The Iliad and the Odyssey were, Adam Parry thought, the beneficiaries of an inherited store of diction, scenes, and at the same time highly individual works that surpasses these conventions. Adam Parry helped prepare the ground for the recent Homeric revival by affirming his father?s belief in a strong inherited tradition, but also by emphasizing Homer?s unique contributions within that tradition.

1. Which one of the following best states the main idea of the passage?
(A) The Homeric poems are most fruitfully studied as records of the time and place in which they were written.
(B) The Homeric poems are the products of a highly developed and complicated tradition of oral poetry.
(C) The Homeric poems are currently enjoying a resurgence of critical interest after an age of scholarship largely devoted to the poems? nonpoetic elements.
(D) The Homeric poems are currently enjoying a resurgence of scholarly interest after am age during which most studies were authored by nonacademic writers.
(E) Before Milman Parry published his pioneering work in the early twentieth century, it was difficult to assign a date or an author to the Homeric poems.

2. According to the passage, the work of Simone Weil and Erich Auerbach on Homer was primarily concerned with which one of the following?
(A) considerations of why criticism of Homer had moved to peripheral issues
(B) analyses of the poetry itself in terms of its literary qualities
(C) studies in the history and nature of oral poetry
(D) analyses of the already ancient epic tradition inherited by Homer
(E) critiques of the highly technical analyses of academic critics

3. The passage suggests which one of the following about scholarship on Homer that has appeared since 1970?
(A) It has dealt extensively with the Homeric poems as literary art.
(B) It is more incisive than the work of the Parrys.
(C) It has rejected as irrelevant the scholarship produced by specialists between 1935 and 1970.
(D) It has ignored the work of Simone Weil and Erich Auerbach.
(E) It has attempted to confirm that the Iliad and the Odyssey were written by Homer.

4. The author of the passage most probably quotes Alexander Pope (lines 24-26) in order to
(A) indicate that the Homeric poems have generally received poor treatment at the hands of English critics
(B) prove that poets as well as critics have emphasized elements peripheral to the poems
(C) illustrate that the nonpoetical emphasis also existed in an earlier century
(D) emphasize the problems inherent in rendering classical Greek poetry into modern English
(E) argue that poets and literary critics have seldom agreed the interpretation of poetry

5. According to the passage, which one of the following is true of Milman Parry?s immediate successors in the field of Homeric studies?
(A) They reconciled Homer?s poetry with archaeological and historical concerns.
(B) They acknowledged the tradition of oral poetry, but focused on the uniqueness of Homer?s poetry within the tradition.
(C) They occupied themselves with the question of what qualities made for great poetry.
(D) They emphasized the boundaries of oral poetry.
(E) They called for a revival of Homer?s popularity.

6. Which one of the following best describes the organization of the passage?
(A) A situation is identified and its origins are examines.
(B) A series of hypotheses is reviewed and one is advocated.
(C) The works of two influential scholars are summarized.
(D) Several issues contributing to a currently debate are summarized.
(E) Three possible solutions to a long-standing problem are posed.

wsywsywsy

　【V1：2011.09】荷马史诗在200-600 B.C.的时候被篡改了很多，因为人们在口头流传的时候改了很多原来的语言，现代人想编辑出最authentic的edition。普遍方法是通过脚注来解释篡改的内容，但是有一个人说这些不同其实是因为演员在表演这些诗歌的时候加入了自己的即兴所以慢慢原本的语言就不在了，而这些演员自己的创造又是很valuable的所以should be paid more attention，而且提出出multi-version的荷马史诗让其中包含这个新加入的元素。

　　【V2：2009】荷马史诗. (P1) 无法确认荷马史诗是writeby荷马ororal，从16世纪到20世纪出现了很多关于此的text，有很多variation，很多学者对此很敢兴趣，但是却无法解决。(P2) F提出了一个新观点，认为研究这些variation并不重要，而更加注重讲述故事的时间，地点，意义等内容。并且用了一种不同与其他学者的方式，将这些variation describe as footnote(有细节题)文章最后一句对F提出疑问，大概是doubt whetherthe variation‘ sinsignificance intersttoF notenoug has(有一题问此句意义) 有主题题：我选提出了一种新的theoryexplainaphenomena78.关于canada以前是否有hugehot-blooded举了很多原因：气候，气候对plantbiomass的影响以及其对hot-blooded的predator的影响等(有题，except题型)后面有转折however，

　　【V3：2002】荷马史诗(伊利亚特、奥的赛): 对于荷马的两个作品，有一个人好像是通过结构来分析(有composed一词)说6世纪之前怎样怎样(有single一词)，6世纪之后发生变化，在6世纪及其second century开始divergent了，第二段说有另一个家伙，认为不应该从结构上分析，而是要考虑到他的performance(好像是)和其他一些东西，诸如时间地点等等 .

starever

楼主有数学题目可以告诉我噢~