出处 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown_v._Board_of_Education
In 1955, the SupremeCourt considered arguments by the schools requesting relief concerning the taskof desegregation. In their decision, which became known as "BrownII"[52] the court delegated the task of carrying out school desegregationto district courts with orders that desegregation occur "with all deliberate speed," aphrase traceable to Francis Thompson's poem, The Hound of Heaven.[53]
Supporters of the earlier decision were displeasedwith this decision. The language “all deliberate speed” wasseen by critics as too ambiguous to ensure reasonable haste for compliance withthe court's instruction. ManySouthern states and school districts interpreted "Brown II" as legaljustification for resisting, delaying, and avoiding significant integration foryears—and in some cases for a decadeor more—using such tactics asclosing down school systems, using state money to finance segregated"private" schools, and "token" integration where a fewcarefully selected black children were admitted to former white-only schoolsbut the vast majority remained in underfunded, unequal black schools.[54]
For example, basedon "Brown II," the U.S. District Court ruled that Prince EdwardCounty, Virginia did not have to desegregate immediately. When faced with acourt order to finally begin desegregation in 1959 the county board ofsupervisors stopped appropriating money for public schools, which remainedclosed for five years, from 1959 to 1964. White students inthe county were given assistance to attend white-only "privateacademies" that were taught by teachers formerly employed by the publicschool system, while black students had no education at all unless they movedout of the county
能否让原始狗主确认下呢。。。。
| 
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2013-6-16 03:44:55
收藏
收藏
楼主