ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1384|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

终于憋出一篇作文,请大牛打分指点

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2013-6-15 17:15:39 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
8.1日考试,已经准备3个多月了,端午节假期开始准备作文。写作真的很痛苦,今天中午憋出第一篇作文(主要是背),由于本人在职复习,时间紧迫,请各路大牛指点一二,判断一下这样子能得到3分吗。
Based on the assumption that the reducing circulation is result from the lower price of its competitor, the argument concludes that reducing its price will cause the increasing of circulation and attract more business. To substantiate the conclusion, the arguer states that price is the crucial problem. The argument is not very persuasive since it omits several concerns that should be addressed in the statement. In my opinion, it fails to demonstrate the correlation among the price, the circulation and the business.
The major problem with the argument is the assumption that the reducing price is adequately resulting in the increase of circulation. However, this assumption is unwarranted. A series of factor such as the content of the newspaper, the printing quality, may affect the circulation. Without regarding these factors, it is difficult to conclude that the reducing price will lead to the increase of circulation.
Similarly, the assumption that the increase of circulation will cause more advertising business is also flaw. For instance, whether to advertise in the newspaper may depend on the readers of the newspaper. Circulation is not the only factor.
Before reaching my conclusion, it is necessary to point out several concerns that undermine the argument. The argument fails to analysis the reason why the circulation is declining, and fails to research the situation of Bugle.
To sum up, the argument fails to substantiate the claim that the reducing price will result in the increase of circulation and advertising business. The assumption mentioned in the article does lead strong support to the conclusion. To make the conclusion more convincing, the author should provide more information about why the circulation is decline, and demonstrate the crucial difference with Bugle. If the article includes the information discussed above, the argument would be more convincing and logically acceptable.  

收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2013-6-18 00:15:44 | 只看该作者
3分可不够用啊.......
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2013-6-18 15:10:00 | 只看该作者
从没写过作文,如果能拿到4.5-5分就perfect了
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-5-20 03:42
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部