ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: bejamin1111
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[SC总结] OG 13 , 87题的疑惑

[复制链接]
11#
发表于 2013-4-15 19:00:50 | 只看该作者
DUKB24 发表于 2013-4-15 18:45
好吧- -

我的名字被黑了很多回,我叫DUKB

我们群里说到你都说成DUKE
12#
 楼主| 发表于 2013-4-15 19:18:16 | 只看该作者
DUKB24 发表于 2013-4-15 18:45
好吧- -

我的名字被黑了很多回,我叫DUKB

涨姿势了!这是大家对你的美好祝愿!
13#
发表于 2013-4-16 11:29:20 | 只看该作者
kiwifoodtown 发表于 2013-4-15 10:10
现在分词如果作定语修饰名词必须紧贴名词,中间不可有逗号间隔。

我觉得这个 , V-ing 能不能做定语好像争议很大

比如下面这一题的D中,OG的解释就暗示了可以作为定语

21。Neuroscientists, having amassed a wealth of knowledge over the past twenty years about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood, are now drawing solid conclusions about how the human brain grows and how babies acquire language.
(A) Neuroscientists, having amassed a wealth of knowledge over the past twenty years about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood, are
(B) Neuroscientists, having amassed a wealth of knowledge about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood over the past twenty years, and are
(C) Neuroscientists amassing a wealth of knowledge about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood over the past twenty years, and are
(D) Neuroscientists have amassed a wealth of knowledge over the past twenty years about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood,
(E) Neuroscientists have amassed, over the past twenty years, a wealth of knowledge about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood,
答案是A
OG对D项的解释: The final descriptor in present tense,now drawing conclusions....does not fit the opening clause, which is in present-prefect tense(have amassed a wealth)and seems to midify adulthood.
14#
发表于 2013-4-16 11:35:39 | 只看该作者
bejamin1111 发表于 2013-4-15 10:36
不管做什么成分,都是modifier,而comma+ving,再怎么也不会修饰preceding noun。。。 ...

这个规则真的存在吗?我看很多这个一直都有争议。
15#
发表于 2013-4-16 12:27:44 | 只看该作者
adamzjw 发表于 2013-4-16 11:29
我觉得这个 , V-ing 能不能做定语好像争议很大

比如下面这一题的D中,OG的解释就暗示了可以作为定语

s,ving,vo这个结构

默认的ving作为noun modifier修饰s

这属于comma+ving的一种特殊情况
另外一种更清晰的理解就是,ving是被(注意!)a pair of comma 隔开的,所以这种结构和comma+ving不一样的
16#
发表于 2013-4-16 19:35:48 | 只看该作者
DUKB24 发表于 2013-4-16 12:27
s,ving,vo这个结构

默认的ving作为noun modifier修饰s

A pair of commas的确是一个很好的indicator

谢谢dukb
17#
 楼主| 发表于 2013-4-17 12:25:17 | 只看该作者
DUKB24 发表于 2013-4-16 12:27
s,ving,vo这个结构

默认的ving作为noun modifier修饰s

这个厉害了!又涨姿势!
18#
发表于 2013-5-1 22:05:56 | 只看该作者
同问!!!!
19#
发表于 2013-5-1 22:13:43 | 只看该作者
LZ麻烦再问下只有s+v+o结构后面,+v-ing,v指代s吗?
20#
 楼主| 发表于 2013-5-1 22:17:52 | 只看该作者
冷月无声5555 发表于 2013-5-1 22:13
LZ麻烦再问下只有s+v+o结构后面,+v-ing,v指代s吗?


comma+Ving,这个modifier结构正常情况下修饰前句动词或者整句话,逻辑主语和前句保持一致;不过也有一些情况下修饰preceding noun,如下句:
In a plan to stop the erosion of East Coast beaches, the Army Corps of Engineers proposed building parallel to shore a breakwater of rocks that would rise six feet above the waterline and act as a buffer, absorbing the energy of crashing waves and protecting the beaches.

absorbing修饰的前面的noun buffer
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-20 07:37
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部