|
256. The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacitus. (A) The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacitus. (B) To the historian Tacitus, the nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote two letters, being the only eyewitness accounts of the great eruption of Vesuvius. (C) The only eyewitness account is in two letters by the nephew of Pliny the Elder writing to the historian Tacitus an account of the great eruption of Vesuvius. (D) Writing the only eyewitness account, Pliny the Elder's nephew accounted for the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacitus. (E) In two letters to the historian Tacitus, the nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius. 同意根据逻辑意思判断，但是想问一个解题的判断原则？： 比如256中的A项因为 the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters 有歧义而不正确。可是从一般思维判断好像总会 下意识认为火山爆发是wrote的内容，即in two letters是修饰wrote；要理解成“写了有关......两封信中的火山爆 发......给the historian Tacitus”从意思上讲并不容易，毕竟wrote和in two letters比较连贯，而于火山爆发一起就比 较唐突了。所以请教一下大家有什么好的尺度来掌握逻辑意思判断？谢谢。 | 
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2005-5-19 22:55:00
