ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Press Secretary: Our critics claim that the President's recent highway project cancellations demonstrate a vindictive desire to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties. They offer as evidence the fact that 90 percent of the projects canceled were in such districts. But all of the canceled projects had been identified as wasteful in a report written by respected nonpartisan auditors. So the President's choice was clearly motivated by sound budgetary policy, not partisan politics.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the press secretary's argument depends?

正确答案: B

相关帖子

更多...

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 49074|回复: 65
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD17-Q34,Q9

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-8-22 11:51:00 | 只看该作者

GWD17-Q34,Q9

GWD17-Q34 During the month of May, crabs arrive on Delaware’s beaches to lay eggs.  Certain shorebirds depend on these eggs for food during their annual spring migration to their northern breeding grounds.  Delaware’s crab population has declined recently.  This decline, however, poses no serious threat to the migrating shorebird populations:  by remaining longer in Delaware, the birds will be able to eat enough crab eggs to allow them to complete their migration.

 

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

 

  1. No other food available to the birds on Delaware’s beaches is as nutritious and accessible as are crab eggs.
  2. The decline in the number of crabs on Delaware’s beaches is due to the harvesting of crabs by humans.
  3. There are more crabs on Delaware’s beaches than in any other area that the migrating birds pass through.
  4. The crabs do not conceal their eggs.
  5. The earlier in the season the shorebirds complete their migration, the more likely they are to breed successfully.

E

我认为E和题目没有关系,人家的argument说的是poses no serious threat to the migrating shorebird populations,又没说the success of the shorebird's breeding. 我选D。因为我作者说只要这些birds留得时间久,他们就可以找到足够的eggs吃。但是如果crabs没藏eggs,就是说所有的eggs能找到的都找到了,那么留得时间再长也不可能再“无中生有”出一些eggs给他们吃。所以weaken了argument。

10. GWD17-Q9:

Press Secretary:  Our critics claim that the President’s recent highway project cancellations demonstrate a vindictive desire to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties.  They offer as evidence the fact that 90 percent of the projects canceled were in such districts.  But all of the canceled projects had been identified as wasteful in a report written by respected nonpartisan auditors.  So the President’s choice was clearly motivated by sound budgetary policy, not partisan politics.

 

Which of the following is an assumption on which the press secretary’s argument depends?

 

  1. Canceling highway projects was not the only way for the President to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties.
  2. The scheduled highway projects identified as wasteful in the report were not mostly projects in districts controlled by the President’s party.
  3. The number of projects canceled was a significant proportion of all the highway projects that were to be undertaken by the government in the near future.
  4. The highway projects canceled in districts controlled by the President’s party were not generally more expensive than the projects canceled in districts controlled by opposition parties.
  5. Reports by nonpartisan auditors are not generally regarded by the opposition parties as a source of objective assessments of government projects.

 Answer: B    人家题目中已经说了They offer as evidence the fact that 90 percent of the projects canceled were in such districts,而且all of the canceled projects had been identified as wasteful in a report written by respected nonpartisan auditors。B只是换了个说法把facts又说了一遍,我认为不构成assumption。我选了D。用denial test,如果president的那些projects更贵的话,就说明president的projects也可能是wasteful的,但他cancel的又大部分不是他自己的project,所以构成偏袒嫌疑。

请大家指教~~

推荐
发表于 2014-4-3 11:11:51 | 只看该作者
只能是B
试想如果有200个项目是wasteful的, 各有100个在总统选区和反对党选区,总共取消了100个,而90%的被取消的项目在反对党区域,即反对党被取消了90个,而总统选区只取消10个,结果就是极大的不公平.
而B说大多数wasteful的项目不再总统选区, 可以假设反对党180个wasteful的项目取消90个,留90个,总统20个wasteful取消10个留10,这样大家被取消的wasteful都是一半,公平.
沙发
发表于 2007-8-22 12:15:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用emmadon在2007-8-22 11:51:00的发言:

GWD17-Q34 During the month of May, crabs arrive on Delaware’s beaches to lay eggs.  Certain shorebirds depend on these eggs for food during their annual spring migration to their northern breeding grounds.  Delaware’s crab population has declined recently.  This decline, however, poses no serious threat to the migrating shorebird populations:  by remaining longer in Delaware, the birds will be able to eat enough crab eggs to allow them to complete their migration.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

  1. No other food available to the birds on Delaware’s beaches is as nutritious and accessible as are crab eggs.
  2. The decline in the number of crabs on Delaware’s beaches is due to the harvesting of crabs by humans.
  3. There are more crabs on Delaware’s beaches than in any other area that the migrating birds pass through.
  4. The crabs do not conceal their eggs.
  5. The earlier in the season the shorebirds complete their migration, the more likely they are to breed successfully.

E

我认为E和题目没有关系,人家的argument说的是poses no serious threat to the migrating shorebird populations,又没说the success of the shorebird's breeding. 我选D。因为我作者说只要这些birds留得时间久,他们就可以找到足够的eggs吃。但是如果crabs没藏eggs,就是说所有的eggs能找到的都找到了,那么留得时间再长也不可能再“无中生有”出一些eggs给他们吃。所以weaken了argument。

10. GWD17-Q9:

Press Secretary:  Our critics claim that the President’s recent highway project cancellations demonstrate a vindictive desire to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties.  They offer as evidence the fact that 90 percent of the projects canceled were in such districts.  But all of the canceled projects had been identified as wasteful in a report written by respected nonpartisan auditors.  So the President’s choice was clearly motivated by sound budgetary policy, not partisan politics.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the press secretary’s argument depends?

  1. Canceling highway projects was not the only way for the President to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties.
  2. The scheduled highway projects identified as wasteful in the report were not mostly projects in districts controlled by the President’s party.
  3. The number of projects canceled was a significant proportion of all the highway projects that were to be undertaken by the government in the near future.
  4. The highway projects canceled in districts controlled by the President’s party were not generally more expensive than the projects canceled in districts controlled by opposition parties.
  5. Reports by nonpartisan auditors are not generally regarded by the opposition parties as a source of objective assessments of government projects.

 Answer: B    人家题目中已经说了They offer as evidence the fact that 90 percent of the projects canceled were in such districts,而且all of the canceled projects had been identified as wasteful in a report written by respected nonpartisan auditors。B只是换了个说法把facts又说了一遍,我认为不构成assumption。我选了D。用denial test,如果president的那些projects更贵的话,就说明president的projects也可能是wasteful的,但他cancel的又大部分不是他自己的project,所以构成偏袒嫌疑。

请大家指教~~

17-34

E The earlier in the season the shorebirds complete their migration, the more likely they are to breed successfully.

If these birds have to stay in Delaware's beaches longer to get enough crab eggs, they will arrive at their destination later. That means these birds will complete their migration later, therefore, their success rate of breeding will be lower. This will lead to less population of the bird, hence, poses  threat to the bird populations.

17-9

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2007-8-22 12:18:00 | 只看该作者
第9呢?没显示出来哦。。
地板
发表于 2007-8-22 12:31:00 | 只看该作者

17-9.

B. The scheduled highway projects identified as wasteful in the report were not mostly projects in districts controlled by the President’s party.

Here, the scheduled projects are those which are not cancelled.

If most of the scheduled projects - i.e. not cancelled projects - which are identified as wasteful were in the districts controlled by the President's party while most cancelled projects are from the districts controlled by opposition partyes, it implies that these projects are handled to benefit to the districts controlled by President's party. It will contradict to what the secretary said - "So the President’s choice was clearly motivated by sound budgetary policy, not partisan politics."

So the secretary has to make this assumption in order to make her conclusion true.

5#
 楼主| 发表于 2007-8-22 12:35:00 | 只看该作者
但是我觉得assumption应该等同于support的作用。在XXX的前提下,所以XXX。照你这么说的话,B是weaken。在B的前提下,secretary的conclusion是错的
6#
发表于 2007-8-22 12:45:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用emmadon在2007-8-22 12:35:00的发言:
但是我觉得assumption应该等同于support的作用。在XXX的前提下,所以XXX。照你这么说的话,B是weaken。在B的前提下,secretary的conclusion是错的

B implies that the President didn't do anything to benefit the districts of his party, so B does support the secretary's conclusion, therefore, it is one of the assumption of THE SECRETARY's conclusion.

If B is not true, that is, most uncancelled projects which are actually wasteful are in the districts controlled by the president, it means the presidents make the unfaire decision to protect his party.

7#
 楼主| 发表于 2007-8-22 17:53:00 | 只看该作者
懂了~谢谢!!!
8#
发表于 2008-3-22 16:15:00 | 只看该作者
up
9#
发表于 2008-6-9 00:59:00 | 只看该作者
up
10#
发表于 2009-3-11 10:51:00 | 只看该作者
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-4-25 11:43
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部