ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1833|回复: 5

OG17-CR-184 未讨论过的点

[复制链接]
发表于 2017-6-23 09:14:13 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
Gortland has long been narrowly self-sufficient in both grain and meat. However, as per capita income in Gortland has risen toward the world average, per capita consumption of meat has also risen toward the world average, and it takes several pounds of grain to produce one pound of meat. Therefore, since per capita income continues to rise, whereas domestic grain production will not increase, Gortland will soon have to import either grain or meat or both.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
(A) The total acreage devoted to grain production in Gortland will not decrease substantially.
(B) The population of Gortland has remained relatively constant during the country’s years of growing prosperity.
(C) The per capita consumption of meat in Gortland is roughly the same across all income levels.
(D) In Gortland, neither meat nor grain is subject to government price controls.
(E) People in Gortland who increase their consumption of meat will not radically decrease their consumption of grain.

理解为什么选E,比较疑惑D为什么错。看了cder的讨论都是围绕C、D的问题,所以只能发新帖求助。

D取非(有价格管制)的话,meat,grain价格上涨,那么实际消费量不变,那就没必要进口了呀。

 楼主| 发表于 2017-6-23 19:43:23 | 显示全部楼层
自己顶起来
发表于 2017-6-25 17:25:45 | 显示全部楼层
题目中没有提到政府相关的东西啊。。为什么要选D
 楼主| 发表于 2017-6-26 11:44:00 | 显示全部楼层
qstv5445 发表于 2017-6-25 17:25
题目中没有提到政府相关的东西啊。。为什么要选D

我就是觉得很有道理哇
发表于 2017-6-26 15:34:33 | 显示全部楼层
即使D取非造成價格上漲
但是題目同時也說人們薪水上升(per capita income in Gortland has risen )
首先 你並不知道價格上漲多少(而且也不見得是上漲, 選項只有說government control);
你也不知道薪水上升多少
在你這兩個都不知道的前提下
你要如何推得實際銷費量不變?


发表于 2017-6-26 16:15:59 | 显示全部楼层
你是如何从价格上涨推测到实际消费量不变地?实际消费量变不变不正是E的讨论内容吗?实际上,你价格涨不涨,因为人们收入高了,并不知道他们会不会买。所以这个讨论点还是回归到肉和米的消费量问题,选E
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-3-29 16:22
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部